My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900502
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:20 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/2/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#14 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 2, 1990 <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that the Planning commission needs better <br />communication with the Council liaison. <br /> <br />Thomas stated that she has never felt the need to make any <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that Council sets the policy and it is important <br />that the Council understand the recommendations sent to them by <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned if the liaison would be willing to submit a <br />report to the Planning commission on the previous Council action. <br />Thomas stated that she would be willing to submit a written <br />report as long as the issues do not predate her tenure on the <br />Council. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that what the Planning commission is looking for <br />is more guidance. <br /> <br />Thomas questioned if the Planning Commission could address the <br />Council in a memo. Berry stated that is important in a decision <br />to know the reasons why people vote negatively. <br /> <br />Wietecki suggested that the Council submit a four minute report <br />to the Planning Commission on the outcomes of the previous <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Thomas questioned if the Planning Commission wants this item <br />submitted as a written report or given orally at the meetings. <br />DeBenedet stated that the purpose of this report is to inform the <br />Planning Commission of the reasons why certain decisions where <br />made. <br /> <br />Thomas stated that she can appreciate more two-way communication <br />between the Council and the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Berry summarized what liaisons have done in the past. <br /> <br />Thomas stated that she is now aware of the Planning Commissions <br />concerns on this issue and will bring this up at the Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Goedeke stated that the minutes of the Council and the Planning <br />Commission differ immensely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.