My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900606
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/6/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 7 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 6, 1990 <br /> <br />Johnson questioned if there was any color rendering of the <br />exterior. Brachman responded that there were no details yet. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the Commission needs to know the detail of <br />the exterior and asked the applicant to describe the proposed <br />design. Brachman stated that the final exterior details have not <br />been designed but that they would maintain the exterior as <br />previously approved. Brachman added that the brick colors would <br />be earthtone to cream, that there would be brick with white trim <br />and cedar horizontal siding. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned if the staff reviewed the exterior details. <br />Shardlow responded that because the proposal was the same as <br />previously approved, staff did not go into detailed review. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned if there was enough detail <br />suggested that the final details should be <br />presented to the Council. <br /> <br />wietecki questioned the site lighting. Brachman responded that <br />that would be provided in the site detail. <br /> <br />to review <br />developed <br /> <br />and <br />and <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned if Dominion owned the lot to the north where <br />the drive would go through to Minnesota street. Brachman <br />responded that it is under contract. <br /> <br />Goedeke pointed out the need for better maintenance of the house. <br /> <br />Gordy Howe described the history of the house and how they have <br />boarded it up and are maintaining it. <br /> <br />Goedeke pointed out that the site is a eye sore and that they owe <br />the neighborhood better maintenance of that property. <br /> <br />Roberts asked for clarification of what is being <br />Shardlow responded that a special use permit for <br />approval is being requested. <br /> <br />asked <br />site <br /> <br />for. <br />plan <br /> <br />Kim Ross, 162 Minnesota Avenue, stated that Roseville doesn't <br />need another apartment because they can't fill the existing <br />apartments. Ross also pointed out that the condition of the <br />house is atrocious and that it is being broken into by kids. <br />Ross stated that a petition in opposition is in progress. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the house condition is a code enforcement <br />item which staff will work on. <br /> <br />Howe stated that they are stuck with the house and will burn it <br />down if they have to. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.