My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900606
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/6/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 9 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 6, 1990 <br /> <br />been proposed, maybe there would have been a different result. <br />DeBenedet suggested that a condition be added to require escrow <br />funds for sidewalks on Minnesota with the recommendation that the <br />City consider installing the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Keel questioned the location of the sidewalk. DeBenedet <br />responded that the sidewalk should be from Rice street to the <br />entrance of Materion Park. <br /> <br />Brachman asked for clarification of the sidewalk requirement. <br /> <br />DeBenedet responded that <br />sidewalk be constructed <br />sidewalk fund. <br /> <br />the City's ordinance require <br />or funds contributed to the <br /> <br />that <br />City's <br /> <br />Brachman questioned why they should be required to put sidewalk <br />all along Minnesota Avenue. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that the Commission is trying to resolve a <br />safety issue for both the existing and the new residents of the <br />proposed apartments. <br /> <br />Brachman testified that they have unique access demands and very <br />little frontage on streets. <br /> <br />Keel stated that it is important that the City handle the <br />sidewalk issue and holds the proper hearings. <br /> <br />Kathy Forliti, 334 Minnesota Avenue, stated her concern about the <br />increase in traffic on Minnesota Avenue. She pointed out that <br />not everybody will go to Rice street because of the congestion. <br />Forliti pointed out that the speed of the traffic on Minnesota <br />Avenue is a problem and that there doesn't need to be any <br />additional traffic on Rice Street because it is already <br />congested. <br /> <br />Johnson indicated that she can understand the concern but that <br />all the City can do is try its best to make the best of a bad <br />situation. <br /> <br />Forliti <br />because <br />traffic <br />traffic <br /> <br />questioned how much increase in traffic can be expected <br />of the project. Brachman responded that for apartments, <br />is spread out over the day and would generate less <br />than a commercial project. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that it would be important for the applicant to <br />bring the traffic information to the city council. Johnson also <br />questioned if there would be any value to provide no left turn <br />signs at the exit from the project site to Minnesota Avenue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.