My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900711
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:26 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/11/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 11, 1990 <br /> <br />Berry questioned why the handicapped stalls weren't closer to the <br />entry way. Richards pointed to where they were on the design. <br /> <br />Berry suggested that they move the handicap stalls as close to <br />the door as possible, with accompanying curb cuts. Hasek <br />commented that they might incur a loss of a parking stall. Berry <br />commented this would be no problem. <br /> <br />Roberts complimented the developer for the work they have done to <br />improve the project. Roberts questioned what would occur on the <br />space between the street and landscaping on the southside. <br />Richards stated that he thought it would be grass. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned on irrigation plans. <br />they will irrigate. <br /> <br />Richards stated that <br /> <br />stokes commented on the pylon sign and whether the Olive Garden <br />had considered a more aesthetically pleasing ground sign. <br />Richards asked what the ordinance allows. Stokes stated that <br />they were in compliance but that a ground sign would be better. <br /> <br />Richards commented that they have a variety of sign designs, and <br />if a pylon sign obstructed another sign or if their sign would be <br />obstructed, they would consider changes or other options to a <br />pylon sign. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned what the sign would look like. Richards <br />stated that the lettering would be similar to the wall sign <br />pictured architecture rendering of the building. Richards added <br />that it would be an attractive sign and that they would work <br />with the city. Stokes commented that he would like to see what <br />the sign looked like. <br /> <br />Berry commented that they could bring the sign design to the <br />Planning Commission at a later date. Berry questioned Richards <br />on the color of the sign. Richards said he would bring in sign <br />options to the Staff. <br /> <br />Berry suggested that they bring in sign design to the City <br />Council. Stokes commented that was a good idea. <br /> <br />Roberts asked about signs on the frontage road. Richards stated <br />that perhaps a small sign on the backside so that people would <br />know where they were going. Richards said it would be quite <br />small. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.