pm_900711 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 Wednesday, July 11, 1990 Presentation Hasek summarized the site and location of the lot split. Hasek stated that the lot is sufficient for two lots. Hasek stated that the driveway would have to be reconstructed to code. DeBenedet questioned whether any additional right-of-way was needed. Keel stated that no additional right-of-way is need. Keel stated that no sewer served this lot and that additional storm sewer assessments will have to be paid. stokes questioned whether sideyard setback of the existing house would be in excess of five feet. Jopke stated that it would be. stokes questioned where the house would be located. Andert stated that the house would most likely be located on the higher ground of the lot, near the northeast corner, however, a location had not been finalized. Johnson read a letter from a neighbor at 2446 Cohansey in opposition to the lot split. Johnson read a petition from neighbors stating their opposition based on seven reasons, into the record. Keel stated that the elevation was higher on the proposed lot. Keel testified that the lot is buildable and that if constructed properly, a building would not effect other properties. Keel said that there would be an increase in runoff, but that it would be small. Johnson questioned whether the drainage would be diverted. Keel stated that it would not. wietecki questioned what kind of study could be made to assure neighbors. Keel said that staff could evaluate drainage when a detailed drainage plan is submitted as part of a building permit application. Wietecki questioned what would happen drainage problems cannot be solved. building permit can be withheld if neighbors. if the lot is split and Jopke stated that the it is deleterious to Keel indicated that there are many site designs that will work.