Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday October 3, 1990 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />wietecki moved and Berry seconded to recommend that in reviewing <br />the comprehensive plan, the Council should clarify the policy of <br />allowing Amusement Centers in the City because of the security <br />impact , the impact on public health safety and welfare of the <br />community and because of the impact on the market values in the <br />surrounding neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry Goedeke, Johnson, Roberts, <br />Stokes wietecki <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2153 <br /> <br />Richard Kettler/Mel Buessler request for a rezoning at 1023 <br />Parker Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow presented request stating that the proposal was <br />continued in order to let neighbors meet with developer and look <br />at similar buildings the developer has built. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that the City's policy of rezoning R2 lots in R1 <br />zones was established in 1959 and reaffirmed in the 1980 <br />Comprehensive Plan and again in 1983. The only condition was <br />that the lot was adequate size to support the building. <br /> <br />Roberts questioned whether <br />besides lot size. Shardlow <br />throughout the city, not <br />district. <br /> <br />there were any other conditions <br />stated that R2 should be scattered <br />clustered or place in a distinct <br /> <br />Kettler stated that the proposal meets the Comprehensive Plan <br />requirements, that due to financing concerns it is unlikely that <br />it would become a rental property, it won't add to traffic <br />because the units have only a two bedroom and because the design <br />caters to elderly and handicapped, that the architecture fits in <br />the style of the newer built homes and that the lot is adequate <br />for this type of building. <br /> <br />Mr. Foster, 969 Parker Avenue, questioned the 1983 policy <br />reaffirmation. Shardlow stated that the 1959 original plan <br />stated that there would be no zoning for R2 districts, but that <br />applications for rezoning in R1 districts would be entertained on <br />a lot by lot basis. In 1983, the Metropolitan Council asked for <br />the City to review accessory apartment options in R1 districts. <br />The City determined that its 1959 policy was adequate and that no <br />changes needed to be made to it. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan <br />also designated R2 as a low density area. <br />