pm_910313 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday March 13, 1991 Page 12 the area adjacent to the lakeshore is used for picnic tables and grass and they have no plans for improvements in that area. Roberts asked if they were in a position to review the PUD. Shardlow stated yes, that this was a sketch plan review. Shardlow added that the purpose of sketch plan review is to give the applicant some sense of if the proposed concept is workable and what level of investment on their part will be required. Shardlow pointed out that the applicant could then make a decision on whether or not to proceed further with the PUD. Roberts asked if the PUD was the method necessary to bring the site into compliance. Shardlow responded that it was. Roberts suggested that additional information should be provided concerning the volume traffic, restriction on the number of boats in the water and stored on the site, screening of the site from adjacent properties, limits on the number of buildings on the site, appropriate controls to avoid any hazard to water quality on Lake Owasso and surrounding wetlands, DNR and Grass Lake Water Management organization concurrence, lot grading information, and identification of safety standards to allow sufficient emergency vehicle access to the site. Roberts pointed out that none of these areas would appear to require substantial investment by the applicant. wietecki asked what parking lot improvements would be made over time. Slater responded that providing additional asphalt would be more hazardous to the lake because of additional run off. Slater pointed out that the gravel on the site allows percolation into the soil which is better for the lake. Wietecki stated that this is an appropriate use of the site and that the applicant should move forward with the application. Wietecki pointed out that the applicant should consider staged parking lot improvements and that there be limits to the amount of winter storage of boats on the site and screening provided. Stokes stated that other areas that should be explored include restriction of hours, motor size, and gas and oil storage. Stokes also indicated that proper emergency vehicle access should be provided and warning signs be placed on victoria. Berry stated that the marina has been there for over 29 years and has become a neighborhood institution which should be protected and not screened from Victoria. DeBenedet stated that you can't tell how many boats are there from victoria and if you looked, you would be off the road. DeBenedet stated that motor restrictions would not be reasonable or effective and that somewhere in the process, the applicant