My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_910410
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1991
>
pm_910410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:41 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/10/1991
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 14 <br /> <br />April 10, 1991 <br /> <br />along with the proposal and that he hoped that it worked out. <br /> <br />Harms stated that when she was a teen, they were dying for a <br />facility like this. Harms pointed out that there can be more <br />problems at house parties than would be at a facility such as <br />this. Harms stated that the facility is needed, that it is a <br />smart business move by the applicant and could be good for other <br />businesses in the area. Harms added that there may be less of a <br />parking problem because parents are dropping kids off. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, Roberts, Wietecki, Harms, <br />Thomas, DeBenedet <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />Plannina File 2231 <br /> <br />Pope Associates, Inc. request for special use permit and variance <br />to zoning ordinance at 2931 Partridge Road. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow summarized the history of previous Systems control/Pope <br />Associates proposal at County Road C and summarized the current <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Roberts asked if any building setback variances are necessary. <br />Shardlow replied that there were none. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked for clarification of water line issues. Keel <br />stated that there was no problem and that any concerns can be <br />resolved. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned if the drainage was adequate. <br />that it was. <br /> <br />Keel stated <br /> <br />wietecki asked the reason for the variance to have a free <br />standing trash enclosure. Shardlow replied that it was the same <br />proposal that was reviewed on the previous site. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned that type of trash the applicant would have. <br />Dennis Palmer replied that they have very little trash, mainly <br />paper and consumables from their employees. Shardlow asked if it <br />could be handled inside the building. Jerry Perkins, proj ect <br />architect, stated that they can use interior containers and could <br />eliminate the trash enclosure. <br /> <br />Goedeke pointed out that because Partridge Road area is not well <br />known, that it could be difficult for potential customers to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.