Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />April 10, 1991 <br /> <br />heard anything from adjacent property owners about any interest <br />in redevelopment either. Crosson stated that National School Bus <br />Co. was a good company which is willing to work with the City to <br />comply with the ordinance. He stated that it, however, would be <br />tough to invest in the site and have to do it over in the future. <br /> <br />Chris Bird, an attorney for the owner stated that they are here <br />to work with the City and address its concern but that the City <br />has to be sensitive to the needs of the applicant. <br /> <br />Shardlow pointed out that the City is not aSking for anything <br />relating to the Twin Lakes proj ect, only the current Roseville <br />zoning standards. Shardlow testified that it has always been the <br />City's policy to require non-conforming uses to be brought up to <br />code when a special use permit is requested. <br /> <br />wietecki asked if a landscape plan is required and if one had <br />been provided. Shardlow replied that none had been submitted and <br />that the applicant has requested a variance to the landscape <br />standards. Shardlow indicated that, in this case, the <br />application was not incomplete, just not adequate. <br /> <br />Goedeke stated that the City can't make a decision without <br />adequate plans. <br /> <br />Shardlow indicated that if there was any miscommunication on the <br />part of staff, that he apologized and that the Commission should <br />be clear with the applicant concerning its expectations, <br />including the fact that there was a non-conforming metal building <br />on the site. Shardlow stated that the City needs to be flexible <br />relating to the proposed street changes. <br /> <br />Crosson stated their intent to work with the City concerning the <br />landscaping aspects of the proposal. Crosson also stated his <br />concern about not being informed of the inadequacies of the plan <br />until they received a staff report a few days before the meeting. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned who was responsible for submitting the <br />application. Crosson replied that it was National School Bus Co. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned the process that was followed for this <br />application. Morley replied that the application process was <br />complicated by the fact that they were close to the deadline when <br />the application requirements were discussed with staff. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if a one month continuance would be reasonable. <br />Morley replied that it would. <br /> <br />MOTION <br />