My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_910508
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1991
>
pm_910508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:43 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/8/1991
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />May 8, 1991 <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />very adult oriented. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned the height of the ceiling. Ebeling replied the <br />ceilings are 25 feet high. <br /> <br />DeBenedet closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Roberts moved and Harms seconded to approve John Ebeling/Welsh <br />Companies, Inc. request for a special use permit to allow a 14,000 <br />sq. ft. amusement center ~t 1655 W. County Road B-2, based on plans <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Thomas, Stokes, Goedeke, Roberts, <br />Wietecki, Harms, DeBenedet <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />The Planning Commission meeting recessed at 9:06 p.m. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reconvened at 9:14 p.m. <br /> <br />other Business <br /> <br />Discussion concerninq ordinance amendments relating to automobile <br />reintal aqencies. <br /> <br />PJ:'esentation <br /> <br />Shardlow outlined the issues relating to automobile rental and <br />leasing facilities in the City of Rosevi11e and presented slide <br />photographs taken of the different facilities. Some of the issues <br />associated with these particular uses include the location of the <br />use in the district, the overall size and number of cars on the <br />site, provisions for parking, screening, and maintenance of <br />vehicles on the site. <br /> <br />Stokes commented that he had seen cars for sale on some of the <br />sites and questioned if this was permitted. Shardlow responded <br />that a conditional use permit was needed and stated that staff <br />would check records to see if any of these sites had obtained a <br />permit. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that there was one common problem on most sites in <br />that vacuum cleaners were left in front of the buildings and <br />maintenance of vehicles was being done in front. <br /> <br />Harms inquired if the owners could be required to keep the vacuums <br />and the cars away from the front of the buildings. Shardlow <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.