My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_910612
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1991
>
pm_910612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:44 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/12/1991
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />June 12, 1991 <br /> <br />paget <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />1. That an additional warning sign be added adj acent to the <br />southwest corner of the Kohl's store. <br /> <br />2. That additional fire lane signs be added at the rear of the <br />building as required by the Fire Marshal. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Harms, Thomas, Goedeke, Roberts, <br />wietecki, DeBenedet <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Plannina File 2225 <br /> <br />National School Bus Service Inc. request for a special use permit <br />and variances to the zoning ordinance at 1905 W. County Road C. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Discussion occurred concerning the following issues: <br /> <br />1. The need for more specific action points. <br /> <br />2. Traffic concerns including the impact of the number of drivers <br />and buses coming and leaving the site, the amount of peak hour <br />traffic impact on adjacent streets, the possible signalization <br />of County Road C and Arthur Street, the advisability of street <br />access from County Road C, and the need to keep Prior Avenue <br />open to provide access to Hyman Freightways. <br /> <br />3. The ability to bring about a better use on the site in <br />accordance with the Twin Lakes plan if this special use permit <br />is approved. <br /> <br />4. The adequacy of the landscaping on the site. <br /> <br />5. The inadequacy of screening on the west side of the site when <br />new development occurs on the adjacent parcel. <br /> <br />6. The control of run off from the site and the impact on water <br />quality in Langton Lake. <br /> <br />7. The necessity of bringing the building into compliance with <br />the design standards and the need to set a specific time frame <br />for compliance which is not tied to the street improvements. <br /> <br />8. The possibility of instituting a moratorium in the Twin Lakes <br />area to bring about consistent development. <br /> <br />One resident spoke concerning this item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.