My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_921209
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1992
>
pm_921209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:58 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/9/1992
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />December 9, 1992 <br /> <br />Paget <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />should be public or private and whether they could be connected to <br />Dale street and snow removal. The Commission also discussed <br />project density and whether the comprehensive plan should be <br />amended to show medium density all the way to Dale street. <br /> <br />Citizens <br /> <br />Victor stumo, 686 Wheaton, questioned if the ponding area would <br />cause problems and how snow storage would be handled. Mr. stumo <br />stated his concern that the project would deteriorate over time. <br /> <br />John Borgstrom, 644 County Road C, questioned what action would be <br />taken tonight and whether the Planning Commission could be <br />bypassed. Mr. Borgstrom expressed concern about the inadequate <br />setback of the driveway and parking adjacent to his property, and <br />stated the road should be 50 feet away from his property. Mr. <br />Borgstrom testified that 2 story buildings do not fit the area and <br />that snow storage and drainage would be a problem because his <br />property is lower. <br /> <br />John Foster, 675 County Road C, stated that the neighborhood has <br />organized to protect the neighborhood and questioned how the <br />Commissioners would feel if the development was being proposed in <br />their neighborhood. Mr. Foster also pointed out that they moved to <br />the site because it was a single family neighborhood and that the <br />proposal would change that. Mr. Foster also stated that more <br />appropriate development is possible. <br /> <br />Harold Vansicle, 686 County Road C, pointed out that they moved to <br />the area because of the large lots and open space. Mr. Vansicle <br />stated that the project is too dense, that there is inadequate <br />setback adjacent to his property, that the project would add to <br />traffic problems on County Road C, that the design doesn't fit the <br />neighborhood, that the project would an enclave in the middle of a <br />single family neighborhood, and that it would set a precedent which <br />would allow development of the American Legion property. <br /> <br />Jan Chelstri, 690 County Road C, expressed concern that the project <br />would result in the loss of open space, wildlife and the park like <br />setting which they moved into the neighborhood for. <br /> <br />Karen Foster, 675 County Road C, stated they had moved out of st. <br />Paul to get away from the noise of traffic and dense development of <br />the inner city that the proposed proj ect would create. Mrs. Foster <br />also was concerned that the development would tower over the single <br />family neighborhood. <br /> <br />Jill Berquist, 701 County Road C, indicated she just moved into the <br />neighborhood 2 weeks ago and would not have bought if she had known <br />about this proj ect. Mrs. Berquist stated she was concerned it <br />would set precedent and that new development would isolate the <br />neighborhood. She also stated increased traffic would be a <br />problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.