Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />June 9, 1993 <br /> <br />Pagel <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />interests. McFarland pointed out the value of neighborhood parks <br />and talked about the volunteer efforts of the neighbors to develop <br />and maintain the park. Mr. McFarland pointed out that he hoped the <br />church would stay but that it would have to stabilize at some <br />point. McFarland stated that Bruce Russell Park must stay. <br /> <br />Bill Metzger, 1245 willow Lane, stated that he supports the <br />church's proposal because it would be very much "win-win" for the <br />communi ty as a whole. Mr. Metzger further stated that the proposal <br />would give the church an opportunity to improve all levels of youth <br />service which would be a positive aspect to the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Jerry Baumann, 1178 Ryan Avenue, pointed out that the park had been <br />renamed to honor an officer killed and the loss of the park would <br />be a disservice to his memory. Baumann pointed out that all <br />churches in the community provide services and there is no <br />guarantee that the church would continue to serve in the future. <br />Baumann testified that 35% of the members of the church do not live <br />in Roseville and that the growth will occur outside of Roseville. <br />Baumann said that the residents don't deserve to lose the park <br />which they have paid taxes to maintain and that families have built <br />the little league field in the park. <br /> <br />Tom Turba, 1170 Burke, expressed concerns about traffic flow <br />through the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Roger Moberg, Calvary Baptist Church, spoke on behalf of the <br />proposal and viewed the expansion of the park at Lexington and <br />County Road B as being positive for the church and the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />steve Favilla, 2451 Simpson, stated that he used the park as a kid <br />and moved because of values provided by the church. He stated that <br />there should be a solution to work together and which would be best <br />for the community. <br /> <br />Linda Barber, 2525 Cohansey, stated that a new expanded park at <br />Lexington and County Road B would be better utilized by a lot more <br />residents of the community. <br /> <br />Sandy West, 1204 Ruggles, stated that the church has other options <br />such as a satellite church and by making better utilization of the <br />existing site and building. She stated that the park is needed for <br />her kids to play in and that once it is lost you can't get the park <br />back. He stated that neighborhood parks are important to provide <br />recreational opportunities within walking distance to home because <br />once in the car, people can go to other larger park areas such as <br />Central Park. <br /> <br />John Barke, 1187 Ryan, indicated that he was a member of the church <br />who is opposed to the proposal. Mr. Barke stated that the church <br />should live within the site and that there would be other <br />alternatives which would be available for expansion. Mr. Barke <br />