My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_940112
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1994
>
pm_940112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/12/1994
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Wednesday, January 12, 1994 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />safety problems with the parking lot, as well as drainage problems. The denial is based <br />on the following findings of fact: <br /> <br />1. The plan, as presented, is inconsistent with the Roseville Comprehensive <br />Land Use Guide Plan. It would be premature to base any land use <br />decisions on the developing update of the Comprehensive Land Use <br />Guide Plan. <br /> <br />2. It has not been established that the proposed joint use of the church <br />parking lot would adequately meet the needs of both the townhome <br />residents and the church membership. <br /> <br />3. The plan, as presented, does not achieve maximum coordination between <br />the proposed development and the surrounding uses. <br /> <br />4. The plan, as presented, does not provide for adequate transition or <br />buffering, in terms of green space, between the proposed project and the <br />single family neighborhood to the south. <br /> <br />5. The proposed internal street system may create conflict between the <br />church traffic and the townhome residents, creating a safety hazard. <br /> <br />6. It has not been established that the drainage created by this project will <br />not impact neighboring single family houses. <br /> <br />7. The proposed density of the project is defined as high density. Medium <br />density would provide a more logical transition from the surrounding <br />single family uses. <br /> <br />8. The church does not have an overall master plan for its property nor any <br />protections to preserve open space. <br /> <br />Roll Call: Ayes: Sandstrom, Rengel, Thomas, Wall, Harms, Wietecki <br /> <br />Nayes: None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.