pm_940309 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 1994 project area. He asked if they were isolated and if there were compatibility issues with the land to the west. He asked if comments had been received from the property owners to the west. Shardlow responded there have been no comments to date. Member Sandstrom asked if the Borgstrom property would become non- conforming if the project were completed as proposed. Shardlow responded to that, it would not become non-conforming because the townhouse road system is a private road system and the setbacks vary from those of a normal public street. Member Sandstrom also asked for clarification regarding the charge for area- wide ponding. Shardlow responded that parcels will be assessed for the improvement. Member Rengel asked if developer Kehr had plans for the property to the east of Borgstrom. And Member Thomas asked if an east-west road were placed through the townhome area, why would it connect two public streets. A general discussion ensued regarding the setbacks and need for public versus private roads, particularly along the east -west road. Member Wall discussed the possible recommendations on the changes to the comprehensive plan. He asked if the change, as proposed by developer Kehr, would preserve property values to the west and east, and whether property across County Road C would have property value problems. Shardlow responded that the area to the west must be screened and buffered with trees and that there appears to be no property value problems in other projects of similar value. Shardlow expressed most concern for the Borgstrom property to the east of the site, provided Mr. Borgstrom does not add his property to the project area. Mr. AI Kehr, developer for the project, explained that John Shardlow had covered all the major points and that Kehr's position would be to simply 4