pm_940309 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 1994 intersection, but what would happen to the property along the northwest of the same intersection. She expressed concern with traffic and speed, especially as it relates to school bus stops. She stated that the single-family neighborhood is being destroyed. Pat Igo, 2225 Victoria Street, spoke in favor of this project because it would keep more families in Roseville as empty-nesters move into the townhome units, new families with children would move into the single-family house. Roger Sedecki, 667 County Road C, a property across the street from the project, stated he was opposed to the project as in the past. He said the project looked similar to the 1992 project. He stated there were a number of unanswered questions concerning the Legion property, the Borgstrom property resale, the Salverda sale, the ponding offsite, the project not being close enough to retail areas, the open space on the site and the side yard setbacks. He said with all these questions, the Commission should not take action. There was no further public comments. Chainnan Keith Wietecki closed the public hearing. Member Thomas asked for clarification regarding what type of projects can be placed in a medium-density residential area. Jopke responded that any type of residential development with a density of 0-1 0 units per acre could be placed in this medium-density residential area. City staff has discretion regarding the specific project which could be placed in a medium-density residential area. Shardlow stated that on the land use plan, the City could set conditions before rezoning to a planned unit development and work out the details for individual projects as well as long-term uses. Member Sandstrom asked when a change occurs in property designations, do the values change and by how much. Shardlow responded that the comparable sales basis will determine whether there has been value changes. 6