pm_940413 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 1994 road can be constructed and with flexible Planned Unit Development setbacks will work. Member Thomas asked what was the typical zoning for an institutionally planned land use. The staff responded it is generally Rl or Bl within which institutional uses are a permitted or special use. Member Rengel asked what direction the land planning criteria in the plan and the Vista 2000 Program provided to the Planning Commission. Mr. Shardlow listed the criteria in the Comprehensive Plan including: access to a County collector road, close proximity to public parks, large enough properties to make a neighborhood development, and greater future flexibility. Member Sandstrom asked if the roads to the west of the Kehr property would be considered in this land use proposal. The staff responded they would not be considered at this time, and only in the future would be designed and built. John Borgstrom, 644 County Road C,expressed concern about the road along the Kehr property east edge. He asked if there would be a hearing on the zoning and subdivision issues. (Yes, scheduled for May 11,1994). Sue LeMay, 792 Rose Place, expressed concern about what the Legion does to the west of the Kehr site. She asked at what point single-family development had been left out of the project consideration. She expressed concern about the connection to Rose Place. Member Harms responded that the Kehr project did not appear economically feasible as a single-family project. Rovay responded that she preferred to see the Legion develop as single-family and not as townhouses which would create a major traffic problem. Jim Bodsgord, 720 West County Road C, asked why the focus on the area has changed from single-family to townhouses. He noted that other areas in the city could be developed for townhouse purposes. He expressed concern 3