pm_940511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville Planning Commission Minutes May 11, 1994 as a private street within the development. Krier also explained the setbacks from the private streets would be 20 feet from the right-of-way line. There would be a 15 to 20-foot setback between the buildings and a 30-foot rear yard setback. Member Thomas asked for clarification regarding snow storage and visitor parking. Member Wall asked for clarification on the materials to be used in the building and asked for variation in materials and design. He asked whether decks would be built on the units and whether a variance would be necessary for such decks. Member Thomas asked how long it would take to start the project and the length of the construction. David Weber stated that the project will be a phased project and that a town home can be built in 60 to 90 days. Member Wietecki asked for clarification regarding signage, storm water design, easement for utilities, and lighting. Member Wall asked for a study to determine where the headlights would be during nighttime driving. Member Harms asked for clarification regarding the design of the units and whether the units would have basements. (Some of the units will have basements according to Weber). Member Wall asked for more evergreens in the landscape, and Member Roberts commented that the two buildings on B and the two buildings on Burke are relatively isolated from the development, but that the density in the entire development is low and acceptable. Member Harms expressed a concern regarding visitor parking. Member Roberts expressed a concern regarding snow removal and storage. Member Rengel asked for a staff design review on the need for sidewalks in the area. No further comment was offered. 6. g) Planning File 2639. An ordinance defining amusement devices, areas, and game rooms, activities 16