Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />permit, and that because of the grading of the site that the back portion of the site may be <br />more visible because it is higher than the front part of the site. <br /> <br />Member Thomas questioned how much of the site was paved, how much of the site would <br />be used for parking, and ifthere were underground tanks present on the site. Mr. Mischke <br />responded that there was asphalt only in the front parking area, that approximately half of <br />the site would be utilized for parking, and there were no underground tanks on the site. <br /> <br />Member Roberts questioned the five year requirement, and asked if a two or three year <br />time period would be more appropriate. Member Roberts also inquired as to the number <br />of vehicles which would be present on the site. Mr. Olson, the proposed new owner, <br />indicated that they own a total of 25 chassis and that 9 to 10 would be a typical number <br />which would be present on the site at anyone time. <br /> <br />Member Thomas questioned the staff concerning the reason for requirements for paving <br />and curb and gutter. The County responded that they are useful in controlling storm <br />water runoff <br /> <br />Member Wall asked the type of investment the new owner would be making into the <br />property. Mr. Olson responded that they would invest in sodding and other improvements <br />to insure a good looking site. Member Wall stated that he be looking for a commitment to <br />clean up the front area and liked the proposed fence design. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that a three year interim use permit would be preferred and that <br />there be a commitment to keep the front yard maintained. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Thomas moved and Chairman Wietecki seconded to recommend City <br />Council approval of a five year interim use permit with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That a stained, wood screen fence be constructed in front of the vehicle storage <br />area, west of the driveway. <br />2. That a landscape plan be submitted and approved by city staff which includes <br />evergreen planting materials. <br />3. That the parking area in front of the building be repaved. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: Rengel, Thomas, Wall, Harms, Roberts, Sandstrom, Wietecki. <br /> <br />Nays: None. <br />