My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_960612
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1996
>
pm_960612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/12/1996
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 12, 1996 <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom suggested that a conditional use permit could provide further <br />compliance with the code and the permits. <br /> <br />Member Wietecki stated that a conditional use permit does not give more protection to <br />the neighbors. <br /> <br />A general discussion ensued regarding enforcement procedures. <br /> <br />Member Rhody stated that he liked the designs for the building, and that the access could <br />be dealt with; parking on County Road C2 can be managed, but he expressed a concern <br />with the landscaping. <br /> <br />Chairman Wietecki stated that the 5 ft. screen with 80 percent opacity should be <br />completely in place within 3 years of planting. <br /> <br />Member Rhody stated that, in addition to the screening, pedestrian passage through the <br />area should be prohibited with hedges or fencing. <br /> <br />Member Sandstrom suggested that a fence, in addition to shrubbery, would solve a part of <br />the problem. <br /> <br />Member Wilke suggested that the owners of the duplexes and the church should come to <br />some agreement on how to screen the parking areas. <br /> <br />MOTION: Member Wietecki moved, seconded by Member Sandstrom, to recommend <br />approval of the draft resolution as submitted by the staff to approve the preliminary and <br />final plat with the conditions listed in the draft resolution #PC 6/10/96b. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />ofRoseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on Tuesday, <br />the _th day of , 1996 at 6:30 P.M. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.