pm_980211 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

stated they have a large investment in the existing building. If the existing building were vacated, only a cabinet shop or a residence would be possible on this site. There will be no more exterior noise. Chairperson Wietecki stated that I-1 zone would allow for any industrial use. Can the City look at areas larger than one site - from “D” to the industrial area? Roseville does not spot zone. Look at what the best use along all of Cleveland would be. Member Harms noted that a succeeding use (such as stamping) could occur which would be a problem in the future. Member Rhody stated that this is a transitional area; spot zoning is not an adequate solution. By planning and with time, this can be managed. Member Rhody asked if the Community Development Department can find another site. Member Harms asked if TIF or land swaps are available for this site. Scheier noted he has met with builders in Lino Lakes and New Brighton and has estimates for new buildings. Member Harms asked what the City could do to help to find a solution in this location. The City must have time. Scheier asked the Planning Commission to consider adding the parcel to the PUD of Centre Pointe. Chairperson Wietecki noted that a change in the Comprehensive Plan will require time, hearings, a PUD and review by Metro Council. Dennis Welsch suggested alternatives: 1.A rezoning as requested; 2.A neighborhood plan and a Comprehensive Plan change; 3.A PUD and a transitional use; 4.A sale and move to another site; 5.A trade and move to another site. General discussion ensued. 7c.Planning File 2987. Sketch Plan Review, tom Scanlon - Proposed subdivision of property at 2120 Cleveland Avenue North City Planner Kim Lee presented an overview of the Scanlon proposal. Dan Gleason, Architect, provided background on three Scanlon proposals, noting the owner’s request to subdivide a one acre lot into four lots. Chairperson Wietecki noted that flag lots are not acceptable in Roseville. 15