My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_980211
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1998
>
pm_980211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:10 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/11/1998
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the City), how dust levels could be reduced (watering piles, sweeling fines, <br />hauling away fines), and plans for future reconstruction of Larpenteur in this <br />area (none at this time). <br />Janet Olson aksed if material from other reconstruction projects will also be <br />recycled (no plans at this time), if on-site crushing and mixing had been <br />considered (no - not enough right-of-way width on City streets), and the timing of <br />evaluation (does not make a difference from a process standpoint - we will know <br />right away if this is unacceptable). <br />Jack Tschida asked if the permit could be revoked if conditions were not met <br />(yes), and how could residents address issues prior to the review process <br />(contact City staff). <br />Denise Hermes, 523 W. Roselawn Avenue, expressed concern about concrete <br />stock piling. At least 75 homes are affected by the noise of dumping cement. <br />The pile of concrete is already huge. At what cost do we recycle. <br />Janet Olson, 418 Glenwood, commented that this continuous type of pounding <br />and grinding has a noise impact. The city should have reviewed the stockpiling <br />earlier. Fifteen days for crushing, 12 days for grinding annually is too much. <br />Duane A. Haukebo, 1731 Galtier Street, explained the land use purchases of the <br />city and county land in the 1970s was to be retained for open space. He <br />recommended that the city research the records of county purchases for open <br />space. The concrete will be reused if not by the county, by the contractor. This <br />activity belongs in an industrial area. <br />Sandra Fox, resident six blocks from the site, expressed concern about the <br />noise. <br />Chairperson Wietecki asked if “white” noise can be used to mask the noise. <br />Dan Soler answered that the County has not used this technology. Big speakers <br />and high voltage are necessary. <br />Resident of the area asked for details of berms and trees - are they for noise or <br />aesthetics. The berm is already in place; the vegetation stabilizes the berm. <br />Chairperson Wietecki closed the hearing and asked for details of the 20' height <br />and comparison to existing piles. <br />Member Harms stated that the construction noise is difficult to live with. The <br />residents around the concrete crushing should not be the experiment. <br />Member Mulder recommended that anything not used within the project must be <br />hauled away each year. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.