My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_980527
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1998
>
pm_980527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:14 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/27/1998
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Harms opened the hearing and requested Dennis Welsch provide an <br />overview of the staff report. Dennis Welsch indicated that the request is to <br />amend the PUD to increase the size of the building to 32,900 square feet; <br />redesign the exterior, and reconfigure the building to meet the needs of <br />residents of the dimentia facility. He presented a comparison of the buiding <br />approved in 1993 and the building as now proposed, and provided a general <br />overview of the site development plan. Mr. Welsch also reviewed the building <br />elevations and photographs of the site. Based on the findings outlined in <br />Section 3.1 of the report, staff recommended approval of the request with three <br />conditions. <br />PeterPfister, architect, described the new design changes for the 36-unit site. <br />Two meetings with the neighbors were held and two alternative designs were <br />discussed. He displayed elevations and landscaping. <br />MemberWilke asked if retaining wall will be fenced. The neighbors concerns <br />was height of the building(now proposed as one-story). <br />Chair Harms asked if erosion is a problem in this area (has been addressed and <br />ison-going). <br />Member Olson asked what were the original concerns with this project (height of <br />structures, appearance/massing, landscaping, and erosion). <br />PeterPfister, architect, presented additional information on the request and the <br />operation of the EagleCrest Facility. Dan Lindh was also present to answer <br />questions. <br />MemberMulder asked how close the building will be to the creek -- a minimum <br />of 50 feet. <br />DeanMasche asked where HVAC will be placed (north side of roof along Lydia). <br />RogerBuettner, 1651 Standbridge, asked about the pitch of the roof and the <br />ultimate height of the building. The neighbors asked that the roof be lowered, <br />especially the high peaks. <br />PeterPfister stated that the roof was changed to a 6/12 roof, and estimated the <br />maximum height. <br />RogerBuettner asked for clarification on slopes of the roof. <br />Sandra Graves, 1670 Lydia, asked if the roof was redesigned. She asked for <br />details of the tree removal and replacement with fast growing materials. She <br />commented that the building looks 2 to 3 stories. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.