My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_980812
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1998
>
pm_980812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:35:22 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/12/1998
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion: <br /> Member Rhody moved, Member Wilke seconded, to recommend <br />approval of the request for a variance from Section 1011.02 to allow the <br />construction of a 12' x 32' addition to a non-conforming residential structure on a <br />lakeshore lot at 257 McCarrons Boulevard, based on the following staff findings <br />and pending approval from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, <br />and with the following provision: <br />A plan for adding vegetative screening on the house from Lake <br />McCarrons must be submitted to the City for review in conjunction with the <br />plans for a building permit, and such vegetation must be installed in <br />conjunction with construction of the addition. <br />Findings: <br />1)Section 1016.16 of the City Code requires a setback of 75 feet <br />from the ordinary high water level of McCarrons Lake. For this <br />reason, the existing structure on the property is nonconforming <br />because it is only setback 10 feet from McCarrons Lake. <br />2)Section 1011.02 of the City Code does not allow the expansion of a <br />non-conforming structure, although Section 1016.22 does allow <br />additions to non-conforming lakeshore lots if the addition meets the <br />setback requirements. The proposed addition will be on the <br />roadway side of the structure and will not reduce the setback of the <br />structure from the ordinary high water level of McCarrons Lake. <br />3)The property was granted a variance from the front yard setback <br />requirements in 1969 for the purpose of constructing the house in <br />its current location. The proposed addition will not extend beyond <br />the established building setback of 27.5 feet from the southern <br />edge of the South McCarrons Boulevard right-of-way. <br />4)The substandard size of the parcel creates a physical hardship for <br />? <br />the applicant. The applicants need for an accessible bedroom and <br />bathroom on the main floor creates a practical difficulty. <br />5)The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and <br />intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City <br />Code (Zoning). The proposed addition will not extend beyond the <br />established building line along South McCarrons Boulevard or <br />reduce the setback of the structure from the ordinary high water <br />level of McCarrons Lake. <br />6)The proposed variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the <br />public health, safety, or general welfare. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.