Laserfiche WebLink
in 1990, was approved for sales displays. Mr.Welsch reviewed the variance <br />requests for the site: expand the existing building to approximately 6,000 square <br />feet by adding 1,875 square feet to the northeast corner of the existing building <br />and combine the existing two signs into one 4' x 8' in size, with a height of 20', at <br />the southwest corner of the site. He outlined the staff recommendation of <br />approval with conditions. <br />Dave Johnson, owner of Suburban True Value Hardware, 1930 Lexington <br />Avenue North, advised he needed the additional square footage to compete <br />(national average is 8,000 s.f.); he needs storage space for large orders; that he <br />would work with City staff and representative Townhome association members <br />for an adequate landscaping plan and will place money in escrow until Spring, <br />1999 to accomplish this; he would replace any trees which may be damaged <br />during excavation; he would paint the addition in a color approved by the <br />Townhome association; he will enclose the dumpster. Mr. Johnson stated he felt <br />there would not be a negative impact on the real estate value of the affected <br />Townhomes and provided an appraisal to support this view. He also discussed <br />his proposal to curb the north and south area, but not the west side (due to <br />existing drainage of the lot) until there was a need to repave the entire lot; could <br />change roof drainage to the south easily which should be reviewed as part of the <br />building permit. <br />Jay Kennedy, Assistant Public Works Director, advised there could be a concern <br />with additional runoff on the site; that the Townhome pond was not designed to <br />handle runoff from True Value and that detention was needed on site from the <br />roof or parking lot. <br />Chair Harms asked if false windows could be installed on new addition to make it <br />more attractive (yes). She asked if additional setbacks had been considered; Mr. <br />Johnson advised he would lose 30% of the project and an aisle. <br />Discussion ensued as to signage as well as possible alternatives to placement <br />of the proposed addition. Member Klausing questioned the need for the <br />proposed signage; Mr. Johnson advised he would like to have a message board <br />on the sign. Member Wiske advised he would prefer a lower monument sign. <br />Chair Harms advised the following had voiced their opinion on the application: <br />Letter from Wayne E. Griesel, 1067 Harriet Lane, Roseville objecting to the <br />application; a letter from Lawrence J. Mathis, 1081 Harriet Ln, Roseville, no <br />objection to the application; phone call from Paul Narum, 1056 W. Roselawn, <br />neutral on the issue; a letter from Cryogenic Laboratories no objection; a letter <br />from Robert and Martha Houck full support of the application. <br />Chair Harms asked if there were any public questions or comments. <br />2 <br />