Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chair Klausing asked for clarification of the encroachment (4 feet or 5 feet). The drive would be 8 feet or 9 feet <br />respectively from the house to the west property line. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked for clarification on the turn-around; it should be included in the variance condition. Mr. Jenson <br />agreed to construct a paved vehicle turn-around space in association with the driveway improvements. <br /> <br />Member Egli asked if there were rules regarding storage and placement of snow. The placement of snow in the swale, <br />west of the lot would carry the precipitation away from both houses. <br /> <br />Member Egli asked for details or comments from adjoining owners. None. <br /> <br />Ralph Jensen noted that a turn-around is planned and a bollard has already been ordered for the site. <br /> <br />Member Egli asked if there were other designs that worked better. Mr. Jensen explained access issues with the existing <br />garage and then with the detached garage for operation of the van and scooter. <br /> <br />There was no public comment. The hearing was closed. <br /> <br />Chair Klausing described the choices on the site; noting that the variance requested may be different than most reviewed. <br />A paved driveway to the property line is required for handicap scooter to be used with a van. Chair Klausing reported on <br />the physical hardships related to ADA. <br /> <br />Member Wilke noted concerns with the gas meters and asked if they had been taken care of (yes). A nine-foot driveway <br />should be approved. Member Cunningham agreed. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Klausing moved, second by Member Wilke, to recommend approval of a zero driveway setback variance <br />in accordance with the following Resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING <br />APPROVAL OF VARIANCE AT 201 McCARRON STREET <br /> <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission finds that there is a physical hardship in denying the applicant a variance to construct <br />a paved surface for the driveway at 201 McCarrons Street, that hardship being the difficulty in accessing the parking <br />structure in the rear of the property without a paved surface; and, <br /> <br />That the necessity of using the parking structure in the rear of the property is the result of a physical hardship, that <br />hardship being the applicant's physical condition requiring the use of a specially equipped vehicle and the inability of the <br />attached garage to accommodate such a vehicle; and, <br /> <br />That the applicant did not create these hardships; <br /> <br />Whereas, the Planning Commission finds that there is a unique physical feature to the property that would justify the <br />variance, specifically the narrow shape of the lot and placement of the principal structure, that there is not a reasonable <br />alternative design that would not require a variance, and that the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance and would not significantly impact the general welfare of the community; <br /> <br />Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends approval of Ralph Jenson's request for a variance to allow a driveway <br />to encroach up to the west property line for the property located at 201 McCarron Street subject to three conditions: <br />1. That the applicant supply a drainage plan for the driveway that directs water away from the neighboring lot; and <br />2. That the applicant remove the existing driveway on the east side of the property and replace it with sod and <br />landscaping; and <br />3. That the applicant construct a turn-around space adjacent to the detached garage. <br /> <br />Ayes: Klausing, Egli, Olson, Cunningham, Wilke <br /> <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Motion carried 5 to O. <br /> <br />7. Public Hearings <br />