pm_010808 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Olson noted that parking would be on the Church parking lot rather than on County Road C-2. Chair Rhody noted that office users may be using the driveway and garage, but not in the street. Deb Bloom explained that a no-parking requirement could be agreed to, but a Council resolution is necessary and another meeting and mailing. Member Olson asked if the item would be placed on the Consent Agenda because there was a negative comment by Mr. Grundum (no, regular agenda). 6(d) Planning File 3334: A request by Robert Reichenbach for a Variance from Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code to allow construction of a kitchen addition on to the home. The property is located at 1858 Hamline Avenue. Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated July 11, 2001. Mr. Paschke explained that Robert Reichenbach is requesting a variance from Section 1004.01 A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) and Section 1004.01 E (Front Yard Setback) to allow construction of a kitchen and covered porch addition onto the existing home. Mr. Reichenbach proposes to construct a 10-foot by 39-foot (390 square foot) kitchen and covered porch addition onto the front of the existing home. The Community Development Staff has determined the proposal for an additional 363 (less the existing front porch) square feet of impervious area on the subject parcel will require a variance to Section 1004.01 A6 of the Roseville City Code. Thomas Paschke noted that distances are unclear regarding the setbacks and there should be a survey. However, a six- foot setback variance is requested, increasing impervious surface from 42.8% to 47.8%. He explained the previous (2000) variance approved for the detached garage, driveway and patio. Staff recommended approval, subject to a survey. Member Olson asked for measurements and setback clarifications. (A survey is needed to resolve this distance). A general discussion of the measured setback ensued. Member Mulder explained the uniqueness of the driveway and garage variances. Chair Rhody asked for clarification on lot coverage requirement. Deb Bloom explained the storm water run-off coefficient for residential lots is 30%. Chair Rhody read an email from Ken Mosler, 1883 Hamline, John & Merven Christensen, 1852 Hamline, John & Agnes Fuhrman, 1877 Huron Ave, Roman & Blanch Achtelik, 1867 Huron Ave., Bruce & Sheryl Workentien, 1893 Huron Ave., stating that the appearance and coverage is not connected with the neighborhood: "This e-mail is to express our concern about the variance to be considered for this project. A variance has been granted previously for the construction of an oversized garage at this location. This is a small lot and is already overbuilt. In addition, the construction of an addition on the front of this house and the upward expansion that has been described appears to conflict with the character and the aesthetics of the neighborhood. I am writing this email on behalf of myself and a number of other neighbors who are concerned about any additional development on this property pending more clarification about the extent and appearance of the proposed addition. " Member Wilke asked that the email be used cautiously because of additional names on the email, without their signatures. Robert Reichenbach, applicant, explained the design of the house. The designers recommended front additions for the kitchen. He reviewed the neighborhood home designs for a compatible solution to the kitchen and porch. The roof pitch will not change, but will expand street-ward. The exterior materials will be stucco on the kitchen. Vinyl may be used on dormers. There were no further comments. Chair Rhody closed the hearing.