My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_020306
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
pm_020306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:02 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/6/2002
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />increase the need for additional on-site parking. The proposed use is consistent with the existing uses within the facility <br />and is consistent with the surrounding mix of office, showroom, and retail uses. Hence, the building and the proposed new <br />use will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, <br />and public welfare. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke also noted that Love From Minnesota will need to meet the requirements of Section 302.13 Off Sale License <br />Regulations of the Roseville City Code. Specifically a license is required; the size of the sales area must be a minimum of <br />1,600 square feet; and said license must meet other applicable requirements of Section 302 There will not be a cooler on <br />site. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if obtaining a liquor license is required. (Not by the City but is required by State law). <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend approval of the request by Love From <br />Minnesota for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the off-sale wine sales at 2465 Fairview Avenue, subject to the condition <br />(s) in Section 6 of the project report dated 03/06/02 amended as follows: <br />IT. TAe retail wiAe sales area, iAslt,lEliA~ sales sssler l3e a FAiAiFAt,lFA sf 1 ,eQQ 5f1t,1aFe feet iA size aAEllssateEl witAiA tAe <br />St,lFFSAt fsstl3FiAt sf tAs s)(iEtiA~ I3t,1iIEliA~. <br />B. The conditional use permit expires 6 months after approval if a building permit (sssleFS) has not been issued. <br />(Section 1013.03) <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />b. Planning File 3374: A request by John Lichtscheidl, 2550 Western Avenue, for a conditional use permit to allow <br />construction of a detached garage 24 feet by 42 feet or 1008 square feet in size. <br /> <br />Chairman Troy Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a summary of the <br />project report dated March 6, 2002. <br /> <br />The City Planner explained Mr. Robert Lichtscheidl has applied for a Conditional Use Permits to allow the construction of <br />a 1,008 square foot (24 foot by 42 foot) accessory building (detached garage) in the rear yard of his property located at <br />2550 Western Avenue. This is a very large lot, zoned R-1 , and is of low density. <br /> <br />He explained that the Lichtscheidl parcel is large for a residential lot at 37,634 square feet (100 feet wide by 376 feet deep <br />or 0.86 acres). Residential lots located to the north and west are of a similar size, while the lots located to the south and <br />southwest are of a more standard residential variety (85 to 100 feet wide by 110 to 130 feet deep); <br /> <br />The proposed structure will be constructed with a wall height of eight feet; a gable roof with a 4/12 pitch truss; similar <br />asphalt shingles to that of the home; similar vinyl lap siding to that of the home; and a steel or aluminum soffit/fascia; <br /> <br />The staff has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit criteria and determined there are no significant impacts and the owner <br />meets or exceeds building and site requirements. <br /> <br />The City Planner reviewed the staff recommendation of approval with conditions as stated in Section 7 of the project <br />report dated March 6, 2002. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked for the size of the existing accessory buildings on the lot; does the 608 sq.ft. get added to the <br />permitted existing garden shed? No variance is needed? Has the City prohibited second buildings on small lots? (Yes) <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked if landscaping or tree planting could be required to mitigate the size impact (Yes). <br /> <br />Member Olson asked for side yard setback requirement (5 feet). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if 5 feet is sufficient setbacks for landscaping (depends on the type of landscaping). <br /> <br />Member Traynor noted a letter to the City Planner from Paul McDougall (March 3, 2002) asked if the property could be <br />used for repairing or selling vehicles? (Not as a business from garage). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.