pm_020710 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chair Duncan asked why a difference between new or used car parking (New car storage only, used car sales is not permitted). Tom O'Brien, Wally McCarthy Auto, noted that 104 new vehicles will be on the lot; it will be maintained by the curb group. The cars will only be new overflow storage. The cars will not have fuses. The cars have been on the site since fall 2001. Member Bake man asked if this site was for more than one dealership (No, Wally McCarthy Cadillac/Olds/Hummer). How many other sites have been looked at? (None) She asked how the loading traffic hazard could be reduced. Member Mulder asked if there is a sales activity on this site (No). If this is a sales lot, it should be subject to a conditional use permit. Member Traynor asked how "vehicle sales" was defined. Could sales persons be barred from selling on the lot or bringing customers to the overflow lot (Ms. O'Brien has no objection). Member Bakeman asked if other interim use permits had been issued for this use. Member Mulder asked if trees had existed on the site. (Yes, trees will be replaced in future according to Dennis Welsch). There being no further comments, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. Motion: Member Duncan moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend approval of a 12 month interim use permit for Wally McCarthy Auto Group (PF #3412) to allow temporary new vehicle inventory storage on the western most parking lot of the Salvation Army, 2445 Prior Avenue, based on the findings of Section 5 and the conditions in Section 6 of the project report dated 6/5/02. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to amend the motion to add condition "e" to prohibit the sale of vehicles on the site. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Mulder, to amend the amended motion to add condition "f" to have the store's conditional use permit updated to include the interim use permit and by updating the language to include the new landscape replacements. Member Traynor expressed concern that this was an inappropriate use of the interim use permit to deal with the conditional use permit. It is a separate issue. Member Ipsen asked what the difference was between and interim use permit and a conditional use permit. Thomas Paschke explained. Ayes: 0 Nays: 6 Motion failed. Vote on Main Motion and Amendment to incorporate additional condition "e": Ayes: 5 Nays: 1 (Bakeman) Motion carried. c. Planning File 3411: Request by Synergy Motor Car Company in cooperation with Roseville Properties for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 1007 .02D12 and Section 1013 of the Roseville City Code to allow a leased portion of 1900 Oakcrest Avenue to be used as an auto rental and leasing business. Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary of the project report dated July 10, 2002.