My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_030205
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
pm_030205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:07 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/5/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Member Peper estimated jobs from 12 to 385 (ranges were based on the Arona-Hamline Master Plan). <br /> <br />Mike Fishback, 2895 No. Hamline Ave., expressed concern about traffic. What would be the change in Hamline <br />Avenue design? Would there be a stop light? Debra Bloom said Hamline is designed as a three-lane County road, <br />similar to Lexington, which currently has 15,000 ADT, and a capacity of 20,000 ADT. No signals or turn lanes are <br />proposed. <br /> <br />John Kramer, Roseville Covenant Church, noted that the Church is pleased with the proposal and fence that it will <br />compliment the Church uses. <br /> <br />Will Wentland, tenant in Hamline Shopping Center, asked when construction will start? Mr. Van Slyke said the <br />proposed start is early summer, 2003. Mr. Van Slyke will have meetings or letters to the tenants regarding timing. <br /> <br />Member Duncan closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, second by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat <br />for Presbyterian Homes, creating three lots and easements as required by the City Engineer from two <br />existing parcels. <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman asked whether this could be approved without the actual lot lines in final locations. A discussion <br />ensued regarding the adequacy of the presentation drawings for a preliminary plat. Cross parking easements and <br />drainage easements will be required. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, second by Member Mulder, to recommend approval of the rezoning request <br />by Presbyterian Homes changing the current zoning of the property from SC, Shopping Center District to <br />Planned Unit Development with an underlying zoning of B-1, Limited Business in the office area and R-7 <br />Apartment District. (The rezoning will be the first reading of the zoning change; the final approval of the <br />rezoning will occur at the time final plans and documents are approved by the Roseville City Council.) <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman agreed with the concern regarding traffic on Hamline Avenue, hoping that it (Hamline) can retain <br />its residential feeling. The building does not appear to be pedestrian friendly (from Hamline and Terrace) and does <br />not have a transit plan. Can the Roseville Circulator pick up residents at a main entrance? Member Stone asked if <br />traffic calming techniques including landscaping could be used to reduce speed on Hamline. Debra Bloom <br />explained traffic calming useful to the Hamline corridor. Staff will work with the developer on calming techniques. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, second by Member Stone, to recommend approval of the General Concept <br />PUD Plan for a mixed-use planned unit development consisting of a 26,600 square foot professional office <br />building, one outlot, and a four-story mixed use retail and senior housing complex with underground <br />parking, subject to the conditions listed in Section 8 of the project report dated February 5, 2003. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Traynor moved, second by Member Bakeman, to amend the original motion to add that <br />the developer shall use all best efforts to work with the City to create and use a marketing plan to attract <br />Roseville seniors to move into this project, increasing the number of residents who are Roseville <br />residents. <br /> <br />Amendment <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Original Motion as amended: <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, second by Member Stone, to recommend approval of the General Concept <br />PUD Plan for a mixed-use planned unit development consisting of a 26,600 square foot professional office <br />building, one outlot, and a four-story mixed use retail and senior housing complex with underground <br />parking, subject to the conditions listed in Section 8 of the project report dated February 5, 2003. The <br />developer shall use all best efforts to work with the City to create and use a marketing plan to attract <br />Roseville seniors to move into this project, increasing the number of residents who are Roseville <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.