pm_030205 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

including new definitions to the Code could resolve these issues as indicated in the staff report of February 5, 2003. Thomas Paschke explained the procedure to modify the Code. Member Stone asked for clarification on live entertainment. Member Mulder explained he was impressed with Thomas Paschke's knowledge of restaurants in the community. Member Stone expressed concern with Section 1 005.04C16 and indicated it should prohibit live dancers or models. The Code should have a definition of "live entertainment" and this should be reviewed by the City Attorney. The Planning Commission is looking for direction on the language for the amendment. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Mulder to recommend approval of the request by the Community Development Department to amendment the text pertaining to restaurants found in Section 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code. Ayes: 5 Nays: 2 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Stone, to reconsider the previous motion. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Stone, to approve the original motion with the addition of "shall not include dancers and models" in D4. Motion as amended: Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Mulder to recommend approval of the request by the Community Development Department to amendment the text pertaining to restaurants found in Section 1002 and 1005 of the Roseville City Code and shall not include dancers and models in D4. Ayes: 6 Nays: 1 Motion carried.. 7. Information, Reports & Other Business (Verbal Reports): a. Park Dedication Fee Revisions (Lonnie Brokke) Lonnie Brokke, Roseville Park and Recreation Director, explained the revisions for a fair park dedication fee. He has visited the Parks and Recreation Committee and will also visit with the HRA. Roseville has not revised the fee structure in eight years. He explained the current fees by housing type. Member Stone stated that fee or dedication supports the new residents and their park use. She recommended that the City be careful in how the dedication is accounted. The City should use a costs basis rather than peer comparison. Member Mulder stated he was troubled with paying for parks while also requiring on-site improvements - seems excessive. The commercial/industrial users should also be evaluated on benefit. The discussion of the nexus continued. Member Traynor asked the staff to review the proposed fees with the City attorney for fairness. Start with the public policy in the Council presentation. Thomas Paschke explained the fee structure process by the City. Member Mulder asked for a list of all development fees in the City of Roseville that may affect a project. Member Bakeman remarked that the park dedication has kept Roseville livable because of good parks. Member Mulder excused himself from the meeting. Member Duncan asked for more true cost accounting based on the activity that causes that use.