pm_030305 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Thomas Paschke indicted the staff recommend approval of the pre-plat, the rezoning, and the Concept PUD, contingent upon those conditions listed in the project report dated March 5, 2003. No further comments were offered; Chair Duncan closed the hearing. Member Mulder stated he was concerned with the lack of specific plans for Phase II. He asked whether the developer could bring the site plan back in for Planning Commission review. Thomas Paschke said either town homes or condo will look like the buildings in Phase II. Member Mulder preferred that a specific design be included or that the project return for review by the Planning Commission. He preferred an amendment to the PUD for Phase II, especially if this project were to be delayed for five years or more. Chair Duncan asked for details of single family home. Mr. Carey illustrated single family homes. Mr. Carey said he was not objecting to returning to the Planning Commission for Phase II, which approval would be subject to returning to the Planning Commission with details.. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for United Properties, creating a park, seven single family lots, 19 lots related to the row townhomes, and a single lot for the senior cooperative. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Discussion: Member Mulder asked what the zoning on Phase II would be. (R-3 primarily for condominiums). Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of the rezoning request by United Properties changing the current zoning of the property from R-1, Single Family Residential to Planned Unit Development with an underlying zoning of R-1, Single Family Residence, R-3, General Residence District, and R- 6, Townhouse District; the final approval of the rezoning will occur at the time final plans and documents are approved by the Roseville City Council). Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of the General Concept PUD Plan for a 13.7 acre mixed-residential planned unit development consisting, a 2+ acre neighborhood park and pond overlook, 7 single family homes, 18 town homes designed as 3 separate "row house" styled structures, a 3 and 4 story, 96 unit senior corporative, and a second phase of either 18 town homes or a 3 story, 30 unit condominium, subject to the conditions listed in Section 8 of the March 5, 2003 project report, and final plans for Phase II to be reviewed by the Planning Commission when appropriate. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Member Stone re-entered the meeting b. Planning File 3448: Request by Gem Investments (Mark Casci) in cooperation with Abra Auto Body and Glass for a GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, REZONING and PRELIMINARY PLAT to redevelop the property at 1910 County Road C from an industrial use to a mixed use business/industrial use to include an 18,000 square foot Abra Auto Body (offices and shop) and a 7,200 square foot office/warehouse facility. Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary of the project report dated March 5, 2003. Thomas Paschke reminded the Commission that they had reviewed the sketch plan for this proposal in November of 2002 and reviewed the proposals being presented. He indicated that Gem Investments (Mark Casci) & Abra Auto Body and Glass have requested consideration of a 2.8 acre mixed-use, two lot, General Concept Planned Unit Development to redevelop the property at 1910 County Road C. The applicant seeks to construct an 18,000 square foot Abra Auto Body & Glass facility on the front (north) portion of the parcel (business use) and a 7,200 office/warehouse facility at the rear (south) of the parcel (industrial use). The existing parcel would be subdivided