pm_030806 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1004.01 A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions - Side Yard Setback) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a detached garage 2 feet from the side yard property line and increased impervious coverage to 2,574 sq. ft. or 38%. Mark Koenig has submitted a proposal to replace an existing detached accessory building and replace/expand the paved surface on the parcel. The proposal seeks approval for the construction of a 528 sq. ft. garage and 592 sq. ft of increased impervious coverage. He also seeks approval to locate the garage and driveway two feet from the side yard property line. The proposed improvements, a 528 sq. ft. detached garage, a 176 sq. ft. parking slab behind the garage, and 637 sq. ft of replaced and additional driveway, increases the parcel's impervious coverage to 2,574 sq. ft. or 38.1 %, requiring a two variances before a building permit can be issued. Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the Community Development Staff recommended approval of a 400 square foot (5.3%) variance, approximately a 3% reduction from proposals, to Section 1 004.01A6 and a 3 foot side yard variance to Section 1 004.02D5 and 703.04B9 of the Roseville City Code for Mark Koenig to allow the construction of a detached accessory building in the rear yard and increased paved surface area at 466 Hilltop Avenue, subject to the following conditions: a. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage maximum of 2,382 square feet or 35.3%. b. The detached garage being limited to a size not to exceed 22 feet by 24 feet or 528 square feet. c. The replaced and expanded driveway not exceeding (including existing driveway) a total size of 1 ,088 square feet. d. The storage slab behind the new garage not exceeding 88 square feet. e. Gutters and downspouts must be installed along the eves of the detached accessory building to direct runoff into the west and south portions of the yard. t. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variances. Mary Bakeman asked if the garage has doors on both the north and south sides (yes). Storage of campers or trucks must be on paved surfaces. Member Stone asked if this is a complete teardown and rebuild. She asked for reasons to place the structure within the setback - why not shift the garage to the west. Thomas Paschke said the drive back will be difficult. Chair Mulder asked if the rear pad storage is set back five feet. (No, but could be as a condition of the variance). Member Stone noted that new garages have more pronounced overhang. Chair Mulder noticed that water must be moved from this area by use of gutters. Mr. Koenig, 466 Hilltop Avenue, explained the reason to move the garage east was to keep more yard. The existing garage is set back one foot from the line. A 96 s.f. storage pad behind the garage is requested to have space for a camper. Drainage runs to the south and southwest. The driver will back all the way to the street. The neighbor to the east was supportive according to Mr. Koenig. There was no public comment offered. Chairman Mulder closed the hearing. Member Peper suggested changing A and D of Section 6.1 to allow a 96 s.t. pad. Motion: Member Ipsen moved, second by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a 783 square foot (11.2% ) VARIANCE to Section 1004.01 A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003, with a 96 s.f. rear pad. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a 3 foot variance to Section 1004.01 E7 (Dwelling Dimensions - Side Yard Setback) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a 3 foot side yard variance to Section 703.04B9 (Driveways on Private Property) of the Roseville City Code, based on the