My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_031001
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
pm_031001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:36:12 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 8:04:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/2003
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />b. Planning File 3471: Request by a request by United Properties for a COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, and GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT <br />DEVELOPMENT, to allow the development of a portion of the Midland Country Club. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to present verbal summary of the <br />staff report dated October 1, 2003. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke advised that United Properties (developer) in cooperation with Midland Hills Country Club is seeking <br />approval of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment changing the designation from Low Density Residential <br />to Medium Density Residential and from Golf Course to High Density Residential; a Rezoning of property from R-1 , <br />Single Family Residence District to Planned Unit Development with an underlying zoning of R-3, General <br />Residence District and R-6, Townhome District; a Preliminary Plat that takes 9 platted lots and creates 6 town <br />home lots with common area and 1 condominium lot with common area; and a General Concept Planned Unit <br />Development for a 30 unit condominium and 6 town home units (2 structures - 3 units attached) on 5-1/2 acres <br />located along Roselawn Avenue and Fulham Street. <br /> <br />He explained the proposed setbacks for the town homes and the condominiums and the heights of the units. He <br />displayed the Tutor design for the town homes and condominiums. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the impacts including traffic, site lighting in conformance with the City Code, parking, <br />mechanical units, and storm water management through Rice Creek Watershed. Utilities are available to serve this <br />site, some of which will need to be relocated within the site. <br /> <br />Staff recommended approval of this project and the four actions necessary to begin preparation of final documents, <br />subject to conditions listed in the staff report dated October 1, 2003. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked for clarification on the comprehensive plan multi-family housing policy throughout the <br />community. He also asked if there were other R1 to R3 rezonings. Member Traynor asked what the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District will review and when the project will be reviewed by them. Thomas Paschke explained the <br />process of adopting a "concept" prior to Watershed review. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman asked if Fulham is public right-of-way (yes, 66 feet). She asked about the height of the building <br />(52' to 59'). <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked if parking will be allowed on both street sides or at all. City Code does not allow for parking on <br />roads 24' width or less. Is there an agreement or easement to allow a portion of the golf course parking for the <br />condo over-flow? (yes) Chair Mulder asked for details on other areas rezoned from R1 and B1 to R3. Thomas <br />Paschke explained more than 20 projects have been similarly rezoned. He said this is not an uncommon practice in <br />the developed suburbs for infill or redevelopment. <br /> <br />No other questions from the Planning Commission were offered. <br /> <br />Brian Carey, United Properties, explained the use of the site and the development concept. The project is marketed <br />to empty nesters and seniors. There are issues which must be resolved. He explained the neighborhood concerns: <br />water in basements, density, sight lines, lighting, wetlands, traffic, and poor soils. He explained neighborhood <br />meetings, reducing the condo from 36 to 30 units to reduce the size of the building, creating 100 feet setback from <br />the east property line. United also met with property owners regarding landscaping that would reduce sight lines <br />and impacts with screening. The site lighting will be designed to be contained on the sight, with decorative, soft <br />lighting on walls or ground. The wetland would be filled in at some locations but replaced elsewhere on the site. <br />The wetland will be improved in quality, with wetlands that will percolate. The traffic concerns will be insignificant. <br />For water drainage, the water will drain away from existing homes. The developer has offered to place drain tile <br />around the house and include sump pumps. The project does have an agreement with the golf course to use the <br />Country Club parking lot for overflow. He listed good reasons for this project: brings a new type of housing to <br />Roseville that will free up single family homes for younger families; the project will contribute to the viability of the <br />Country Club and green space with a high level of architecture. Xcel will light the site, and an extensive landscape <br />plan will be implemented. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked how the drainage plan will work and solve drainage issues for neighbors. Mr. Carey <br />explained the proposed NURP pond (storm capacity) along the south and east property areas. He explained that <br />water would flow west to the Fulham/Roselawn corner, then north along Fulham to a pond in the northwest corner <br />of the site. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked if there was surface water in the northwest corner (water runs from northeast into the site; the <br />outlet is plugged up). Member Mulder asked what assurance there will be to see that improvements are made <br />beyond the property line (landscaping and sump pumps). United will enter into an agreement with a letter of credit <br />for private improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.