pm_050504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Agenda for May 4, 2005 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Page 3 of 5 Motion: Member Traynor moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval of a two foot Variance to Section 1004.016 - Front Yard Setback - for Lot 2, Block 1, Oakcrest Estates, subject to conditions as outline in Section 5 of the project report dated May 4, 2005. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Doherty moved, seconded by MemberWhite, to recommend approval of a five foot Variance to Section 1004.016 - Rear Yard Setback - for Lot 2, Block 1, Oakcrest Estates, subject to conditions as outline in Section 5 of the project report dated May 4, 2005. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Traynor moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to recommend approval of the Final Plat of "Oakcrest Estates, subject to conditions as outlined in Section 5 and as per the conditions in Section 6 of the project report dated May 4, 2005. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. b. Planning File 3638: Request by Russell Cattelan, 2824 Lakeview Avenue, for a Variance to Section 1004 and a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 1013 of the Roseville City Code to construct a 1,007 detached accessory building on the premises. Chair Traynor opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a verbal summary of the project report dated May 4, 2005. Thomas Paschke advised that Russell Cattelan, 2824 Lakeview Avenue, is seeking approval of two variances and a conditional use permit to replace an existing non-conforming detached accessory structure currently located in the front yard, with a larger detached accessory structure in a similar location. He further advised that the Cattelan parcel is a legal, pre-existing but non-conforming land locked parcel served by a private access easement that provides the legal access and frontage to Lakeview Avenue (to the west of the house). Another lot and house sets between the Cattelan house and the Lakeview Avenue right-of-way. Mr. Cattelan seeks approval to replace the pre-existing 504 sq. ft. detached accessory building, located in the front yard with a 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory structure in a similar location in the front yard. This proposal would place the new structure 8 feet from the north (side yard) property line and 21 feet from the west (front yard) property line. CODE EXISTING PROPOSED VARIANCE REQUIREMENT CONDITION CONDITION SECTION 1004.016 REQUIRED SETBACKS Front Yard 30 feet 21 feet 21 feet 19 feet Side Yard 5 feet 36 feet 8 feet NONE I n review of the City Code, variances are necessary from Section 1004.01 A7 (Location-not in front yard), Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements - Front Yard Setback) and a Conditional Use Permit(consistent with Sections 1004.01A4 and 1013.01) is necessary if the 1,007 sq. ft. replacement accessory structure is to be allowed. The City Planner recommended approval ofa Variance to Section 1004.01A7 and Section1004.016, and a Conditional Use Permit for Russell Cattelan to allow the replacement and enlargement of the existing detached accessory structure, based on the findings in Sections 5 and 6 specifying the following conditions of the staff report dated May 4,2005: http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/councillplanning/minutes/2005/pm050504.htm 6/20/2005