Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Agenda for June 1, 2005Page 4 of 8 <br />Section 1004.01A5 (Overall Area), the City Planner recommended the detached accessory structure <br />be reduced to a Code compliant size of 800 sq. ft. <br />The reduction in size of the detached accessory structure to 800 sq. ft. does not require review and <br />approval a Conditional Use Permit, therefore the Conditional Use Permit process is no longer <br />necessary. <br />Staff explained that to complete the land use action appropriately, the Commission can either DENY <br />the request for a 960 sq. ft. detached accessory structure at 833 Sandhurst Drive or accept a willing <br />withdrawal of the application by Mr. Zeimet. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor clarified that to approve the Conditional Use Permit a variance must also be <br />approved. Thomas Paschke said it is difficult to find a hardship for the variance. <br /> <br />Deb Bloom asked the size of the house, excluding the garage. Member White asked for access to <br />proposed garage (drive through existing garage. Member Doherty asked the impervious surface <br />coverage, including the new pavement surface, <br />Member Pust explained the existing versus proposed impervious surface coverages. <br /> <br />Paul Zeimet, 833 Sandhurst, recommended 864 sq. ft. and surround it with grass, and use it for <br />seasonal driveway not requiring pavement. (This would require a 64 sq. ft. variance for accessory <br />storage building in rear yard). <br /> <br />Member Boerigter asked for details required for driveway impervious surface. Thomas Paschke <br />explained Code section 1004.01A13. Member Boerigter said the garage to the east is large – what <br />are dimensions (Thomas Paschke explained it is pre-existing to 1999 and non-conforming). Member <br />Boerigter asked if the variance hardship was the small size of the existing house. The issue is the <br />size of the accessory use in comparison to the house. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor said there is only one large garage in the neighborhood. Member Bakeman asked for <br />the distance between the house and new garage (classic auto storage – 25 to 30 feet from house). <br /> <br />Mr. Zeimet said he was not clear regarding the reason for a variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Zeimet withdrew the Conditional Use Permit request and will build an 800 sq. ft. garage. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Motion by Chair Traynor, seconded by Member Bakeman, to accept the request of <br />applicant, Paul Zeimet, 833 Sandhurst, to withdraw his application for a Conditional Use <br />Permit for construction of a 960 sq. ft. detached accessory structure. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br />  <br />c.Planning File 3645: Request by Rottlund Homes to vacate certain portion of rights-of-way <br />and easements within Phase 1 of the Twin Lakes redevelopment. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a verbal <br />summary of the project report dated June 1, 2005. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke advised that Rottlund Homes, the Master Developer for Twin Lakes Phase 1 <br />Redevelopment, seeks approval of a Vacation of certain public road rights-of- way and easements. <br />This vacation request includes approximately 1.6 acres of rights-of-way associated with Mount <br />Ridge Road and 1.3 acres of road and utility easements along Prior Avenue. Approximately 10 <br />acres will be platted and dedicated for road way and utility easements. As other parcels are <br />acquired, there could be additional vacations associated with the construction of Twin Lakes <br />Parkway and the re-alignment and merging of Prior Avenue into Mount Ridge Road. <br /> <br />The actions being requested would allow Rottlund to redevelop between 73 and 80 acres of Phase <br />http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm050601.htm12/27/2005 <br /> <br />