pm_050803 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Agenda for June 1, 2005Page 4 of 7 to make this compatible. The owner (current) could do many fence and landscape improvements. He encouraged the Commission to look forward to a unique design, without further restrictions. Member Boerigter said the future variances may be a concern. The hardship was created by the property owner. A specific finding or record should be made for variance requests on this site in the future. Chair Traynor explained that additional conditions should be added; but he was concerned with traffic and enforceability of conditions to be used in the future. There were no further comments. ____________ Chair Traynor closed the hearing. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Boerigter, to recommend approval of an 892 s.f. lot size variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) for new Parcel “B” for property located at 1822 Dale Court based on the findings in Section 5 of the project report, finding that Parcel B is buildable even with its odd shape and the hardships are the responsibilities of the owner, and subject to the conditions within Section 6 of the project report dated August 3, 2005, including an additional condition: a permit shall be required for any fence regardless of height. Staff is to review landscape plans at the time of the building permit. Ayes: 5 Nays: 1 Motion carried: 5-1 Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member White, to recommend approval of a minor subdivision (Three Parcel Minor Subdivision (City Code Section 1104.04E) creating one new parcel (“B”) with a parcel size of 11, 608 s.f., thereby reducing the size of existing Parcel “A” to 15,514 s.f. for property located at 1822 Dale Court, based on the findings in Section 5 and subject to the conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 3, 2005, including an additional condition: a permit shall be required for any fence regardless of height. Staff is to review landscape plans at the time of the building permit. Ayes: 5 Nays: 1 Motion carried: 5-1 b.Planning File 3659: Request by Meritex Enterprises for a two year Interim Use Permit to allow the storage of motor freight trailers on the lot currently occupied by Shafer Contracting (also an IUP) located east of 2258 Walnut Street building. Chair Traynor opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a verbal summary of the project report dated August 3, 2005. Dennis Welsch advised that Meritex Enterprises, Inc has negotiated a lease with a trucking firm (currently located in the Twin Lakes Phase 1 area) to utilize the vacant paved triangular parcel in the northeast corner of the property, which lies adjacent to Terminal Road and the Minnesota Commercial rail line, as a temporary freight trailer storage site for two years beginning in 2005 and extending through the summer of 2007. The trailers would be leased out as needed and returned to the site empty for storage until needed again. The applicant proposes to use the existing paved parking surface which was used for supplemental parking for the Unisys and Meritex building located at 2555 Walnut Street. The paved truck parking area would be entirely surrounded by 6 foot high cyclone fence (as required by City Code). Four gates would be created, three along Walnut Street and one along Terminal Drive. The paved surface now drains to grassy areas adjacent the site. http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm050803.htm12/27/2005