pm_051207 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for December 7, 2005http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm05120... structure, construction of an 8,000 sq. ft. addition (east side), and construction of a 7,085 sq. ft. bank with a drive-thru. The REZONING request (from B-1 to B-2) will allow Kimco to redevelop the 4.2 acre parcel. The redevelopment proposals in a B-2 zone are permitted uses and do not require site plan approval from the Planning Commission or City Council. The submitted plans must be consistent with Sections 1005 (Business Districts) and 1010 (Design Standards) of the Roseville City Code. Mr. Paschke reviewed the criteria for rezoning: Plan Consistency. When reviewing applications to rezone land, the Community Development Staff first determines whether the anticipated use and subsequent zoning district designations are consistent with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. The Staff has concluded that the proposed reuse of property for multi-tenant retail and a bank is consistent with a land use map designation of Business (B). Compatible Zoning District and Use. Staff has further determined a 26,000 sq. ft. multi-tenant retail building and a 7,000 sq. ft bank are uses best located in the B-2, Retail Business District. The City Planner has reviewed the proposal with respect to the existing and surrounding zoning, as well as for an appropriate zoning designation, and concluded that the B-2, Retail Business District is the most appropriate zoning district given especially given the Sports Authority site and its non-conforming sporting goods use in the B-1-B zone that is better served (permitted) by the B-2 zone. banking institution with drive-thru facilities will add vehicular traffic to the adjacent service drive and increase the turning movements at Fairview Avenue. The Community Development Department has contracted with SEH to review the pre-existing use and the proposed use to determine the extent of any impact. (The consultant will provide more details when a complete site plan is presented to the staff for permits.) Policies. The Community Development Staff relies on the Adopted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goals and Policies as the City Policy by which to formulate a conclusion on whether the rezoning is in the best interest of the City. This information has been analyzed through the Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment process. density business centers creating an enhanced tax base and jobs. deterioration of buildings and infrastructure. Strive for better aesthetic appeal with the use of quality design standards for new development and redevelopment. Actively encourage the redevelopment of blighted commercial and industrial land uses that incorporate planned business atmosphere to provide for a mix of uses, maximize the tax base, increase quality jobs and provide jobs to housing balance in a livable environment. The proposed redevelopment (interior remodel, addition, and new structure) of this site will require Kimco or its contractor to submit plans to the Community Development Department for review by the Development Review Committee consistent with Section 1005 (specific to the Retail Business District) and Section 1010 (Design Standards) of the Roseville City Code. Before any building permit or site plan approval can be given by the City, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water mains need to be designed and sized properly (currently these infrastructure features are provided to the site). The Rice Creek Watershed must review the storm water management plan for this redevelopment (since it is over one acre) and issue the appropriate storm water management surface receive the approval of the City Engineer. A utility plan must be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department and Fire Marshal that indicates the location of the properly sized sanitary sewer and water stubs. Based on the information in Section 5 of the project report dated December 7, the City Planner recommended approval of the REZONING to allow the redevelopment of the 1800 Highway 36 (former Franks Nursery & Crafts). Chair Traynor asked for clarification regarding rezoning vs. CUP within the B1-B zone. He asked for a characterization of B1, B 1-B, and B-2 uses. Mr. Paschke compared uses. 2 of 43/13/2006 8:50 AM