Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for February 1, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0201.htm <br />b.Planning File 3705: Rose Hill Alliance Church, 2105 Roselawn Avenue, request for a <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow the construction of two additions to the existing church and <br />school--including a new handicapped accessible entry and additional classroom/office space <br />Chair Traynor opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the proposed project based on the staff report dated February 1, 2006 <br />Planner Paschke explained that Rose Hill Alliance Church seeks approval to construct two additions <br />totaling 4,012 sq. ft. The additions include a new handicapped accessible entry removing a portion of the <br />interior court yard and a classroom/office/library addition onto the east side of the existing structure <br />requiring a parking lot modification. Other improvements include a new courtyard and landscaping, along <br />with the revised parking lot. Rose Hill church has a split level design. The addition to the main entry <br />includes a larger foyer, wider stairway, and elevator. The upper level addition includes additional storage, <br />mechanical room, and restroom, while the lower level addition includes a coat room and gathering space <br />(outside the fellowship hall). The easterly 1,825 sq. ft. addition includes two classrooms, an office, and a <br />library (stair corridor connecting levels). <br />Rose Hill Alliance Church, originally built in 1968 and located on 2.5 acres, has a Comprehensive Land <br />Use Plan designation of CHURCH, is located in Planning District 11, and the property is zoned R-1, <br />Single Family Residence. <br />As of 1998, the Code was changed in Section 1004.015 to permit churches within an R-1 District, with an <br />approved Conditional Use Permit (to determine impacts) and a 30 foot setback from any adjoining <br />residential property line. <br />The proposed building material includes brick and window glazing to match the existing school/church <br />and a standing seam metal roof for the new entry addition. The addition is designed to blend with the <br />existing structure utilizing compatible materials and colors. The overall structure has a varying height. <br />Specifically the school portion is approximately 18 feet above grade, while the church is approximately <br />43 feet above grade. The proposed school addition will match the existing building height, where as the <br />entry addition includes architectural enhancements that reach an overall height of 26 feet to the roof <br />peak (top). <br />The applicant must provide the Fire Marshall and Public Works Department with the necessary <br />information for them to determine whether resizing of the existing utility services or additional utility <br />services are necessary to accommodate the classroom/office and restroom additions. The submittal <br />includes a discussion on storm water management. However this plan and the subsequent improvement <br />must receive the support of the Rice Creek Watershed and approval by the Roseville Public Works <br />Department. Based on the proposed increase in very limited additional impervious coverage, it is <br />assumed that minimal storm water improvements will be required. Minimal grading is necessary to <br />accommodate the two additions and parking lot reconfiguration. A grading plan will be required at the <br />time of building permit submittal that must include erosion control measures and address storm water <br />management. The proposal includes a landscaping plan for the revised courtyard. This plan has been <br />reviewed and approved by staff. However, a condition will be added that this landscaped area include <br />irrigation. <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed the criteria for issuance of a conditional use permit and explained that this project <br />had little perceived impact. He reviewed: <br />a.Impact on traffic <br />b.Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities <br />c.Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous <br />properties <br />d.Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties <br />e.Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare <br />f. <br />3 of 94/3/2006 11:54 AM <br /> <br />