Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for February 1, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0201.htm <br />Member Wozniak asked if there are requirements for protective barriers adjacent to the play area. (State <br />licenses could require this on the site plan review. There is no specific requirement in the City Code.) <br />Member White explained that the fence should be more than 4 feet in height, usually 6 feet. Member <br />Boerigter added that Mini-Apple Center on Perimeter Drive has a 4 foot fence. <br />Member Boerigter asked if the shared parking requirements and agreements should be written and <br />recorded. Mr. Paschke said there would be a document on file. <br />Member White noted the theater use will increase the use of the building and parking. How will patrons <br />arrive? (bus or car) Thomas Paschke explained that the parking demand over time by substituting the <br />theatre for the existing events reception area. The theatre does plan on bussing patrons to the site. <br />Member Wozniak asked how the fenced Ford dealership would be used as overflow parking. <br />Mike Kerstein of Big City Tavern explained the arrangement with Tom Tischner of the Ford dealership. <br />This space would be used for value parking only at big events. <br />Member Wozniak asked for details of the Oops Theatre. Oops will move completely to the Roseville site <br />from North St. Paul. <br />The Commission discussed the need for screening of exterior prop storage. Mr. Kerstein explained there <br />is no plan to store materials outside at this time. Member White asked if the exterior storage condition <br />invites or encourages such storage. General discussion ensued. <br />There being no further questions Chair Traynor closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Doherty to recommend approval of a <br />conditional use permit for Big City Ventures LLC, 2801 Snelling Avenue and Oops Theater, based <br />on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated February 1, <br />2006. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried: 6-0 <br />The Commission took a 7 minute break. <br />e.Planning File 3692: Continuation - Introduction to Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process <br />for 2006 and 2007, Outline of Metropolitan Council System Statement Issues, and Proposed <br />Participation Plan <br />Chair Traynor opened the continued hearing and requested a verbal summary of the project report dated <br />February 1, 2006. Chair Traynor explained that the plan and the question of whether the city and <br />Commission should begin the Comprehensive Plan updates at this time, assuming the plan is to be <br />completed by January 1, 2008 (or earlier). <br />On January 23rd Vice Chair Bakeman discussed the planning timetable and content with the City Council <br />and Mayor. She noted a community group also offered to help. The Council supports visioning, team <br />building, and a joint meeting with the Planning Commission at some time in the future. Dennis Welsch <br />reported on the Council actions of January 30th. A general discussion of the community planning process <br />ensued. <br />Chair Traynor noted whether there is a visioning process by the Council or not, it is beneficial to <br />deliberately find as many methods as possible to involve the public in the Planning Commission planning <br />process, such as open houses, web site, the city newsletter, local papers, a special newsletter, cable <br />programs, etc. <br />comprehensive plan and visioning appears to be next on their list. He asked if there is a timetable and <br />when the joint meeting may occur. (no schedule yet) <br />8 of 94/3/2006 11:54 AM <br /> <br />