Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roy Nelson, 1799 Rose Place <br />He's not sure what the best plan is but he doesn't like having a cul-de-sac <br />on Rose Place. He's worried about snow plow service ifthere's a cul-de- <br />sac, <br /> <br />Duane Schwartz said small trucks would have to be used to clear the cul- <br />de-sac, which could cause a delay in plowing. <br /> <br />Tom Kough. Councilmember <br />He thinks the city should continue fighting MnlDOT on the closing of <br />Oakcrest at Snelling. <br /> <br />Ralph Zalazar. 1733 Rose Place <br />He and his wife moved into this residence a year ago and weren't aware of <br />these possible changes. He said the impact would affect more than just the <br />homes removed, and he would probably move if these changes went into <br />effect. He likes the streets the way they are now and doesn't want any <br />changes. <br /> <br />Tom Ruesch. 2565 Beacon Street <br />He asked why Fry Street couldn't be lined up with Lincoln Street. <br /> <br />Duane Schwartz restated the county's position on the road width and <br />closeness to the Snelling intersection. <br /> <br />Al Sands. 2612 Aldine <br />He said with Alternative C he thinks the city should also buy 1733 Rose <br />Place because the house has bedrooms on the east side next to where the <br />new road would be. He said with Alternative B the house at 2566 Beacon <br />Street would get waste blowing in their yard and lights into their windows. <br />His favorite is Alternative A but he said additional houses should be <br />moved on their lots. He said he thought everyone would be happy if <br />things were kept as they are right now. He wants the city to fight the <br />closing of the northbound lane on Snelling. <br /> <br />Randy Neprash asked the residents to give their opinions on what they <br />would prefer being done under the assumption that Mn/DOT was not <br />changing their plans for closing the intersection. <br /> <br />Dan Stock. 2565 Fry Street <br />He said instead of changing the layout on the residential side of Fairview, <br />why not go through the commercial side. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring said that had been an option presented to the <br />Commission originally, but it was very expensive and ended up with too <br />much unusable land. <br /> <br />Page 3 of6 <br />