Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes - Wednesday, May 02, 2007 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />to find a solution for a more viable and less-disruptive ingress/egress and <br />on-site route through the Calvary Church property; <br />y Temporary signage will include signs places at the Burke exit at Calvary <br />Church indicating, "no right turn, " or "no outlet. " <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman clarified that residents needed to voice any violation concerns to staff <br />in order for them to enforce conditions on the site. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman thanked residents for their attendance, interest and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke advised that Case PF07-017 was scheduled for City Council <br />consideration and action at their May 21, 2007 regular meeting; and that staff would <br />make modifications to amended conditions as outlined by the Planning Commission <br />prior to presentation of the case to the City Council. <br /> <br />Sign Ordinance Status <br />At the request of Chair Bakeman, Mr. Paschke advised Commissioners that staff had received minimal <br />questions or concerns related to the sign ordinance revisions being advocated, and comments <br />appeared supportive of the work accomplished to-date. Mr. Paschke noted that staff was completing <br />slight modifications to text for consistency, inserting numerous illustrations, and other streamlining; <br />and anticipated presenting the ordinance to the City Council at their May 21, 2007 regular meeting. <br /> <br />b. PLANNING FILE 3692 <br />Continuation of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process - Review of <br />technical update schedule with various City Commissions <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 3692. <br /> <br />Community Development Director John Stark updated Commissioners on the process <br />since the March meeting, with staff presentations to and discussion at the City Council <br />at the March and April Study Sessions; and subsequent City Council consensus for <br />staff to distribute Requests for Qualifications (RFQ's) to planning consultant firms. Mr. <br />Stark advised that staff had sent out twenty-eight (28) RFQ's, with a due date of May <br />18, 2007; with anticipated staff selection of four (4) firms for City Council consideration <br />from whom to request proposals. <br /> <br />Commissioner Boerigter sought clarification, related to a "hybrid" plan as advocated <br />by staff, of the actual scope of the update, and how consultants would speak to their <br />interest and/or fees without knowing what the City was actually requesting. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark advised that the process itself would help define the scope, as the expertise <br />and observations of the consultants on the City's current Comprehensive Plan would <br />be utilized to provide which sections remain viable, or will need extensive work. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included actual cost projections for the update (from $60,000 - <br />$200,000); perceived direction from the City Council on their funding commitment to <br />the update; conversations and observations of the City's Metropolitan Council <br />representative, Ms. Torrie DuPres; and concerns regarding the time frame for <br />completing the update by the anticipated deadline of December 31, 2008. <br />