My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_070502
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
pm_070502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:41:29 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 8:15:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/2/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes - Wednesday, May 02, 2007 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />to find a solution for a more viable and less-disruptive ingress/egress and <br />on-site route through the Calvary Church property; <br />y Temporary signage will include signs places at the Burke exit at Calvary <br />Church indicating, "no right turn, " or "no outlet. " <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman clarified that residents needed to voice any violation concerns to staff <br />in order for them to enforce conditions on the site. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman thanked residents for their attendance, interest and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke advised that Case PF07-017 was scheduled for City Council <br />consideration and action at their May 21, 2007 regular meeting; and that staff would <br />make modifications to amended conditions as outlined by the Planning Commission <br />prior to presentation of the case to the City Council. <br /> <br />Sign Ordinance Status <br />At the request of Chair Bakeman, Mr. Paschke advised Commissioners that staff had received minimal <br />questions or concerns related to the sign ordinance revisions being advocated, and comments <br />appeared supportive of the work accomplished to-date. Mr. Paschke noted that staff was completing <br />slight modifications to text for consistency, inserting numerous illustrations, and other streamlining; <br />and anticipated presenting the ordinance to the City Council at their May 21, 2007 regular meeting. <br /> <br />b. PLANNING FILE 3692 <br />Continuation of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process - Review of <br />technical update schedule with various City Commissions <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 3692. <br /> <br />Community Development Director John Stark updated Commissioners on the process <br />since the March meeting, with staff presentations to and discussion at the City Council <br />at the March and April Study Sessions; and subsequent City Council consensus for <br />staff to distribute Requests for Qualifications (RFQ's) to planning consultant firms. Mr. <br />Stark advised that staff had sent out twenty-eight (28) RFQ's, with a due date of May <br />18, 2007; with anticipated staff selection of four (4) firms for City Council consideration <br />from whom to request proposals. <br /> <br />Commissioner Boerigter sought clarification, related to a "hybrid" plan as advocated <br />by staff, of the actual scope of the update, and how consultants would speak to their <br />interest and/or fees without knowing what the City was actually requesting. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark advised that the process itself would help define the scope, as the expertise <br />and observations of the consultants on the City's current Comprehensive Plan would <br />be utilized to provide which sections remain viable, or will need extensive work. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included actual cost projections for the update (from $60,000 - <br />$200,000); perceived direction from the City Council on their funding commitment to <br />the update; conversations and observations of the City's Metropolitan Council <br />representative, Ms. Torrie DuPres; and concerns regarding the time frame for <br />completing the update by the anticipated deadline of December 31, 2008. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.