res_1757 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8~a_.d in the published notice of hearing. After reading of the notice, all persons presented were afforded opportunity to be hear~ and the names and addresses of the persons appearing and heard by the Council, and the SUbstance of the views presented by them# were as follows J Nlr. ROBERT J;...CKSCN, 2395 Wast County Road C-2: If this i.s a county project and Q community-wide project, he wanted to know why just certain persons are being assessed. hR. JAMES THERRES, 2275 W. HighwQY 36: I\sked about the amount of his assessment. MR. JOSEPH DUDLEY, Attorney at Law, First Natl. Bank Building, St. Paul, Minnesota, representing Murphy Motor Freight Lines: Highly in favor of the project. Nf\. JOHN J..N~,CN, rE!presenting Minnesota Transfer Railway Company: In favor cf the improvement, but objects to a portion of the assessment. NR. CtAREICE J. COULTER, 674 W. County Road C: (owns property at St. Croix street and Highway 36.) In favor of the improvement. ~ UR. DOUG COY, representing Rentco Dtvtsion of Fruehauf t 2700 North Clevel.and: In favor of the improvement. Asked if anything was going to be done to allow the pond at the Freeway exit and Cleveland, directly opposite their facility, run off more rapidly than it does. Wanted to know if the ditch in the improvement would affect the pond. Also said there is a culvert directly 1n front of th~ir property which can't handle the wQter out of the drainage ditch. Wanted to know if there was anything included in the improvement that would alleviate the situation. MR. DON FIEDLER, representing RUdn Tri:lnsport, 214C ';I. County Road C: Question re drainage. MRS. FOREST DAVISON, 2535 W. County Road C: Asked how much their assessment would be. ". '. ' Co~nunications were received from the following: ST. PAUL TERMINAL WAREHOUSE CO: Opposed to the improvement because the proposed assessment rate would create an additional land cost which would bring the investment out of propostion to the economic use of the property. ~111i. ~~~S~ll\,,{lGN CGMi>A.N'l, 2481 N. Cle.elend; Opposed to the improvement because of the assessment formula.