Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. JAMES E. EDLUND, E. D. Edlund and Son Agency, 2049 <br />North Snelling: In favor of the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. CARL J. AHLGREN, 1721 W. Shryer: In favor of the <br />improvement. <br /> <br />MR. WALLACE E. RUOSCH, 2087 Fry Street N.: The people in <br />his block are not troubled by water. Those that had water <br />problems have solved them. Felt it was too much to pay for <br />sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments at one timE. <br />He and his neighbors are opposed to the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. WILLIAM C. LAWRENCE, 2030 Fairview Avenue No.: In <br />favor of the improvement. Also asked if the ditch on the eaEt <br />side of Fairview would be leveled up to the street. <br /> <br />MR. ALBER!' R. SHIELY, 98 Mid Oaks Lane: He had circuli! ted <br />the petition in Ridgewood Lane and Mid Oaks Lane which init1i! ted <br />the proceedings for the improvement, and said that the peoplE <br />in those two areas were unanimously in favor of the improvemEnt. <br /> <br />MR. JOHN E. RAUSCH, 1681 Ridgewood Lane N.: In favor c f <br />the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. HARLAN SMITH. 1706 w. ay,n: Asked what the time <br />schedu~e would be in connection with the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. JAMES E. EDLUND (Spoke before): Asked if it would be <br />possible to get concrete curbs and gutters on Skillman AvenUE <br />after the sewer work is completed. <br /> <br />MR. TED DOLAN, 2095 Fry: Asked:.Lf the majority of the <br />people in the improvement area would be benefited by the <br />construction of the storm sewer, and also asked if it could <br />be shown t~at a majority were opposed if the improvement would <br />be stopped. <br /> <br />MR. JOHN SAYLOR, 2071 MicUothian: In favor of the <br />improvement. He asked if the Counc:.Ll would consider extendilg <br />the sewer line to Eldridge and piCking up the drainage that <br />runs off the school playground. <br />