Laserfiche WebLink
egular City Council eeting <br />onclay, July 23, 2007 <br />Page 13 <br />sel; and questioned the value of seeking another set of attorneys to re- <br />view the case and provide their opinion. <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, authorizing hiring of independent <br />counsel to review the case. <br />®11 Call [ n e en e t ®unsel] <br />Ayes: Kough; and Ihlan <br />ays: Pust; Roe; and Klausing. <br />®ti® fails . <br />® Call es®luti® acce Ling Settle a t] <br />Ayes m Pust; Roe; and Klausing. <br />ayso Ihlan and Kough. <br />®t® Carrie . <br />Following review of ordinance language from eight other first-ring <br />metropolitan suburbs, staff recommended additional language to City <br />Code, Section 505.10, Use of Bow and Arrow, specifically barring <br />their use except in a small number of circumstances. Captain Math- <br />wig advised that language from ordinances for the Cities of Maple- <br />wood and Golden Valley seemed most applicable to what the City of <br />Roseville was attempting to accomplish. Captain Mathwig noted a <br />typographical error on page 3 of the proposed language, line 15, <br />changed from "Fed" to "bowed." <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the proposed language addi- <br />tion; however sought further clarification of the technical definition of <br />"bow and arrow," specific prohibitions, and careful limiting of cir- <br />cumstances for their allowance. <br />