Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 13, 2007 <br />Page 21 <br />Councilmember Pust requested staff to have internal discussions <br />among Police officers and business owners to determine if the title is <br />confusing, and if there were ways to make the training and process <br />more clear. <br />Chief Sletner advised that such language revisions would require a <br />change in code. <br />City Attorney Anderson referenced, as Chief Sletner displayed, the <br />actual notice language sent to businesses, noting that training was op- <br />tional, but non-compliance penalties were less if they participated in <br />the optional training. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested comparisons for compliance among <br />cities requiring mandatory training versus optional training. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested discussion on process revisions be held for <br />another discussion. <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified that a business could remain open <br />during their license suspension; however they could not sell alcohol <br />during the time of suspension. <br />Roe moved, Kough seconded, authorizing the Roseville Police De- <br />partment to issue and administer the presumptive penalty as set forth <br />in Section 302.15 for on-sale license holders who do not participate in <br />optional manager and server training for a first violation in thirty-six <br />(36) months, with the mandatory minimum penalty being a $500.00 <br />fine and a one day suspension; with the date for license suspension at <br />the discretion of the Police Chief. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Pust; Kough; Roe; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />LaCasita <br />Chief Sletner outlined the specifics of this compliance failure and <br />staff's recommendation. <br />