Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 13, 2007 <br />Page 29 <br />Mr. Boryczka expressed his concerns over staff's facts and findings; <br />and provided his interpretation of the City's own water management <br />and overlay district. Mr. Boryczka opined the need to define public <br />waters and wetlands in order to define shoreland exemptions. <br />Discussion included reading of Minnesota Statute and City Ordinance <br />and interpretations of each; classes of City and EQB interpretations <br />for all Class cities in a broader sense; staff's identification of the map <br />presented by Mr. Boryczka and the context of City Code, Section <br />1016.03 as determined by text, not simply illustrations or maps; and <br />shoreland classifications for wetland protection areas. <br />Mr. Darrow advised that staff would ensure that, in the future, the <br />map was colorized to make it easier to interpret. <br />Vivian Ramalingam, 2182 Acorn Road <br />Ms. Ramalingam opined that there may be smaller public water bod- <br />ies not included in a comprehensive list, given the number of lakes in <br />Minnesota. <br />City Attorney Anderson observed that the list of classified public bod- <br />ies of water was inclusive, and opined that just because there was wa- <br />ter didn't mean it was public water. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that, at a minimum, there was the issue <br />of whether this was shoreland or not, and that the petition should thus <br />be put in the realm of supporting a possible environmental review. <br />Councilmember Ihlan further opined her preference for additional <br />time to consider the issue, interpretations and language definitions and <br />to consider the merits of the petition. <br />Klausing moved, Pust seconded, adoption of a Resolution entitled, "A <br />Resolution DENYING the Citizen Petition for an Environmental As- <br />sessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Art Mueller Subdivision Plat of <br />Oak Acres, 2201 Acorn Road (PF07-039)." <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the resolution, opining that the <br />potential impact of a four-unit development was not the sort of thing <br />