Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 13, 2007 <br />Page 30 <br />the legislature was anticipating that would require and EAW, and in <br />fact prohibited that sort of assessment in those contexts. <br />Councilmember Roe offered, and Mayor Klausing accepted, a friendly <br />amendment to the resolution. <br />Revised Motion Language <br />Klausing moved, Pust seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10540 <br />entitled, "A Resolution DENYING the Citizen Petition for an Envi- <br />ronmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Art Mueller Subdi- <br />vision Plat of Oak Acres, 2201 Acorn Road (PF07-039);" amended as <br />follows: <br />Page 1, 3`d "WHEREAS: <br />"WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules 4410.[1100] set forth the procedures to be fol- <br />lowed in making a decision on the Citizen Petition; and" <br />Page 2, "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED..." <br />a) Minnesota Rules ^"'~~ [4410.4600] (Exemptions), subpart 12 (Resi- <br />dential Developments) A. (3) EXEMPTS residential developments less <br />than 40 units in a second class city; [no part of which is within ashore- <br />land area, delineated flood plain, state or federally designated wild <br />and scenic river district, the Minnesota River Project area, or the Mis- <br />sissippi headwaters area is exempt]. <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified that the only issue before the City <br />Council tonight was whether this petition for an EAW should be <br />granted, or denied as recommended by staff. <br />Mayor Klausing, when asked by Councilmember Kough, noted that <br />the developer had yet to submit a Site Plan; but noted that there could <br />be no net increase to runoff and that any additional water needed to be <br />controlled on site based on the developer's engineering study, and re- <br />view and approval/denial by the City's engineer. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her disappointment in not receiving <br />a copy of the citizen petition until this afternoon, after she'd asked for <br />a copy. Councilmember Ihlan opined that she didn't believe it was <br />clear if this was an exempt project and needed additional time to re- <br />view it before City Council action. <br />