pm_070606 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Page 14 Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Bakeman to recommend APPROVAL of the PRELIMINARY PLAT, creating one (1) lot for a senior cooperative and provision of a public road (via dedication of right-of-way) or a private road (via provision of an easement, for United Properties, in cooperation with the Frieda Schultz Family (property owner to allow the development of a multi-story 93-unit senior cooperative at 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue; amended to include conditions, as conditioned in 11.0 in detail of staff report dated June 6, 2007. Commissioner Bakeman offered a friendly amendment to the motion to include the two (2) additional conditions previously referred to by staff. City Planner Paschke advised Commissioners, if they were not inclined to support all components of the proposed application, that they not support any of the applications currently before the Commission, as they were all integrated, and the Commission could consider a motion to deny all three components at one time; based on their findings for denial. Bakeman seconded – will vote in favor – this is isolated piece from rest of TL – different from rest of property; always been considered to be housing; don’t care for specific senior coop there – do like public road connected with it – Commissioner Doherty withdrew his motion. Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Wozniak to recommend DENIAL of the PRELIMINARY PLAT, creating one (1) lot for a senior cooperative and provision of a public road (via dedication of right-of-way) or a private road (via provision of an easement, for United Properties, in cooperation with the Frieda Schultz Family (property owner to allow the development of a multi-story 93- unit senior cooperative at 3008 and 3010 Cleveland Avenue; DENIAL of the REZONING from R-1 Single-Family Residential to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying zoning of B-6 Mixed Use Business Park District; and DENIAL of the GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), as prepared for the June 6, 2007 Planning Commission meeting by United Properties; based on findings outlined below; and based on information provided in the Staff Report dated June 6, 2007. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 (Bakeman) Motion to DENY carried. Chair Bakeman advised that the application would go before the City Council for consideration at their June 18, 2007 regular meeting. Mr. Carey expressed concern that the applicant had not been provided an opportunity for response to the public comments; and noted that the developer had felt very challenged by the project, and had attempted to provide more transition with the town homes. Mr. Carey opined that the project as proposed was supported by staff, and that the applicant had met all requirements outlined by staff, as well as attempting to be open with neighbors, but things didn’t seem to be working out. Mr. Carey observed that the Roseville community is completely built out, and there were few opportunities to develop. Mr. Carey opined that it was incumbent on the leaders of the City to take advantage of opportunities to serve seniors in the community by providing additional housing opportunities; and advised that they may be retuning with this proposal in some form, and sought continued and thoughtful consideration of it. Mr. Carey