My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_070606
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
pm_070606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2007 11:49:06 AM
Creation date
10/9/2007 11:48:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/6/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 6, 2007 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Mr. DeLeo advised that the garage had three (3) stalls, with an unfinished upstairs <br />workshop, but was not applicable for use as a temporary home; noting that the main <br />level had sanitary sewer connections; and that existing electrical and future plumbing <br />services were installed to the garage, and then fed into the home, due to the <br />topography of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. DeLeo advised that the RV was a self-contained unit, with gas furnace; gas and/or <br />electric refrigerator; heat and air conditioning; queen-size bed; shower; two (2) holding <br />tanks with heaters to avoid freezing; and a water hold tank inside. <br /> <br />Discussion among the applicant and Commissioners included, capacity of the holding <br />tanks; anticipated water usage per day; fresh water tank capacity; the applicant’s <br />status of living in the RV at this time; assurances from the applicant of the completion <br />date of the home; applicant’s capacity as the General Contractor; and staff clarifying <br />the process for temporary occupancy permits after initial inspections, then followed by <br />final inspections and occupancy permit issuance. <br /> <br />Mr. DeLeo noted that, for security purposes, and in order to avoid vandalism and theft <br />of personal property stored on the property, they would like to stay on the property <br />during the construction process, as well as to accommodate the work being done by <br />Mr. and Mrs. DeLeo themselves as time allows them to do so. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Alan Quaid, 292 Minnesota Avenue <br /> <br />Mr. Quaid spoke in support of the project, expressing no opposition to them parking <br />their RV on the property. Mr. Quaid opined that this would allow them to keep an eye <br />on the project and keep vandalism down. Mr. Quaid further noted that the project <br />appeared to be on schedule, and that the RV was located away from the street and <br />hardly visible. <br /> <br />Jan Koerner, 178 Minnesota Avenue (east of applicant) <br /> <br />Ms. Koerner advised that they had build their home several years ago, and fortunately <br />had a place to stay that didn’t cost them anything. Ms. Koerner expressed her <br />support of the applicant, noting that it was summertime and the project appeared to be <br />proceeding smoothly for the summer months; and further noted the potential damage <br />through vandalism without adequate supervision on the site. <br /> <br /> Linda DeLeo, 280 Minnesota Avenue <br />Mrs. DeLeo reviewed the history of the property, having lived there since 1988, and <br />the numerous and significant water and drainage issues she’d encountered since <br />living there. Mrs. DeLeo advised that she and her husband liked the neighborhood <br />and had chosen to stay there, going through the expensive redevelopment and <br />construction, due to their desire to stay in the area. <br /> <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Doherty spoke in support of the application, noting his initial skepticism <br />with Mr. Alexander’s previous application; however, observed that it seemed to work <br />out very well. Commissioner Doherty noted the hardship for existing residents in <br />having to pay hotel rent during construction of a new home. Commissioner Doherty <br />complimented the DeLeo’s on the looks of the new garage, and opined that if the <br />home looked as good as the garage, it would be a credit to the neighborhood. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.